Jump to content

Talk:William Plankinton/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 04:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commencing review

[edit]
  1. Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
  2. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
  3. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
  4. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
  5. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
  6. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
  7. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
  8. Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
  9. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
  10. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
  11. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  12. No original research.
  13. No copyright violations or plagiarism.
  14. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
  15. Neutral.
  16. Stable.
  17. Illustrated, if possible.
  18. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.

Hello, Doug. I'll be reviewing all the Plankinton articles within the current GAN Backlog Drive and will use the checklist above to register progress. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 04:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One question

[edit]

Only a very short article but breadth of coverage is adequate. I made a couple of minor tweaks and I hope those are okay.

Just one query that needs to be answered – who was it that scarpered off to Mexico? I presume it was Lappen, but it isn't entirely clear so we need the name. I won't put this on hold as you can answer the query in an instant and then it will be promoted. Well done. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Passed

[edit]

That's fine, Doug, and this passes the review so I'm promoting to GA. Well done. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]