This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2017.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles
I don't find any reference to most of these individuals in the cited source, not to Clavering, not to Porhoet, not to Zouche. Even were it found in the cited source, this genealogical trivia would still violate WP:NOTGENEALOGY (we don't even think this is noteworthy for his father, who is one generation closer to this royal connection), but it does not appear too be in the cited source, and as far as I can tell, it is incorrect - Geoffrey of Porhoet was son of Eudes of Porhoet by Anna of Leon, and though Eudes late in life remarried to Bertha (not her sister Constance) of Brittany, there was no genealogical descent here. So, being trivi is reason enough to delete it, but it isn't even reality. Agricolae (talk) 22:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
and I should add, given how broadly I had to search to confirm this, it is clearly giving the connection WP:UNDUE weight too include it anyhow. Agricolae (talk) 22:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
