Jump to content

Talk:Lawrence Bragg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:William Lawrence Bragg)

Crystallography, Rosalind Elsie Franklin and the discovery of the molecule DNA.

[edit]

Why is the name Rosalind Elsie Franklin censored out of this "history", that links crystallography and the discovery of the molecule DNA ?

One source which makes this link, is available on Google: http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/KR/.

This is an observation from Adelaide, South Australia...I have no problem with my IP address, from Adelaide being publicly recorded. Concealing my inquiry defeats empirical objectivity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.131.205.21 (talk) 06:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.131.205.21 (talk)

Why are there exclamatory marks (!) in the sentences about Linus Pauling? Perhaps work is required here to avoid the appearance of POV? Snezzy (talk) 08:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military service

[edit]

These http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/exact=w.+l.+bragg;sort=oldest/start=1 should help fill out some more detail on his army career. David Underdown (talk) 15:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Lawrence Bragg/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Lacks inline citations Snailwalker | talk 01:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Why is the name Rosalind Elsie Franklin censored out of this "history", that links crystallography and the discovery of the molecule DNA ?

One source which makes this link, is available on Google: http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/KR/.

This is an observation from Adelaide, South Australia...I have no problem with my IP address, from Adelaide being publicly recorded. Concealing my inquiry defeats empirical objectivity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.131.205.21 (talk) 06:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 06:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 10:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on William Lawrence Bragg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
There are twelve entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links. -- Otr500 (talk) 00:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]