Talk:William Ketel/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Ealdgyth, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you shortly. I hope you find my feedback helpful. Tayi Arajakate Talk 01:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Is this review still going on? Just asking since it dosen't seem like this page has been updated. If you would like I can help. — I'ma editor2022 (🗣️💬 |📖📚) 03:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- Just a suggestion, but it's if possible to source, an image of his works (in the Rolls Series) could be an improvement for the article.
Assessment
[edit]- Comprehension:
- Verifiability:
- Comprehensiveness:
- Neutrality:
- Stability:
- Illustration: Illustrations are not necessary for this short article. Pass
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
(b) (MoS) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
(b) (focused) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | N/A | Neutral |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | N/A | Neutral |
- Inactive reviewer, second opinion requested on [Talk page]. Review is taken over.
Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Observations
[edit]Document statistics
- HTML document size: 51 kB
- Prose size (including all HTML code): 5318 B
- References (including all HTML code): 1083 B
- Wiki text: 5735 B
- Prose size (text only): 3531 B (593 words) "readable prose size"
- References (text only): 174 B
Page Information
- Page views in the past 30 days = 1,062
- 90 day page views = 168, daily average = 2 views
- Date of page creation = 11:09, 5 January 2016
- Date of latest edit = 15:51, 28 May 2022
- Total number of edits = 47 by 12 editors
- Most of the edits on this page occurred in 2016 ...
- Bots on page noted; no Clue BotNT noted, no vandalism noted. Page considered stable.
Images
- File:William Kitel - Miracula Sancti Johannis.png = Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication
- Image is tagged and CCbySA remit given; appropriate use with suitable caption
Short Article and GA Status
- A short article is regarded as less than 25kb. This article is 51kb (see above)
- Good Article Talk Archives advise, A good article may be of any length, as long as it properly addresses all major aspects of the topic.
- It is reasonably well written.
- Well scribed. Clear, crisp text.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- References identified as reliable sources.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Well referenced and keeps the focus on the work of Ketel.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV is preserved in this article.
Good Article Criteria
[edit]- The article should be clearly written, in good prose, with correct spelling and grammar.
- The article should be factually accurate according to reliable sources
- The article should broadly cover the topic without unnecessary digressions.
- The article should be stable, with no ongoing edit wars.
- The article should comply with image use policy.
- The article is free of obvious copyright violations.
- There being no failures of the Six Good Article Criteria, the article qualifies as GA. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)