This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Re: "IMPORTANT NOTE" - "Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry for 'Keith, William, SIXTH Earl Marischal (1614–1671), nobleman, was the son of William Keith, FIFTH Earl Marischal (c.1585–1635), and Lady Mary, daughter of John Erskine, Earl of Mar'." I have visited the final resting place of George Keith (c.1553-1623), son of William Master of Marischal Keith(d.1580) and grandson of William Keith (d.1581) from whom he inherited the title of Earl Marischal. The epigraph reads: "This building first erected in 1582 was restored by the University of Aberdeen in 1913. It covers the last resting place of George Keith 5th Earl Marischal. He founded the Marischal College in Aberdeen in 1593 and is interred here along with other members of his famous house. The hoarse seawinds and caverns of Dunnottar singing vague requiem to his honourable line and him in the imaginations of some few." The "important note" should be excluded, since this shows that is is the Oxford Dictionary, not this article, that is infact confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.231.169.9 (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]