Talk:William Jarvis (Upper Canada official)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

William Jarvis - Civil Servant and Enslaver

There has been a fair amount of nonsense written about William Jarvis. He was not a politician although he did make one half-hearted attempt to become a member of the Legislative Assembly of Upper Canada. He was not a member of the Executive Council or the Legislative Council. He certainly was not a member of John Graves Simcoe's inner circle. William Jarvis was a senior civil servant who was apparently not very good at his job and had limited influence on government decisions.

A number of authors writing about the history of slavery in Canada refer to Jarvis's "vehement opposition" to Simcoe's move to end slavery in Upper Canada. The only evidence of this, however, appears to be the letter that his wife wrote to her father after the Act Against Slavery was passed in 1793. Jarvis was an enslaver, however, it is probably more accurate to say he objected to the legislation. Griffin's Sword (talk) 15:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Griffin's Sword: The article has to reflect what high-quality, reliable sources say. However, if more recent high-quality sources are reevaluating Jarvis's legacy, that information should also be added to the article, and the reevaluation noted in the article (as information about the change in Jarvis's legacy is encyclopedic information). Z1720 (talk) 15:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]