Talk:William Danoff
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Highly subjective content here. Should be rewritten to reduce the appearance of being a puff piece.199.20.44.50 (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, it is nothing but puff. His family meanwhile, is victimised by his brutal violent abuse of his children. His wife had to raise their children with a stockpile of guns. Fidelity produced the ultimate puff when they showed how he hides behind baby pictures in his office with the TV ad “letters”. 2605:59C8:512E:DF10:D93C:4158:B10D:6457 (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)