Jump to content

Talk:William (The X-Files)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 04:34, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

[edit]

General

[edit]

Infobox

[edit]

Lede

[edit]
  • An episode can really "premiered" how about "originally aired". Thanks!
  • Unlink United States as the other countries not linked
  • In the lede, Fox network is linked, but in the "Reception" section, only Fox is linked. Please choose only one.
  • "The story for the episode was developed by former series star David Duchovny, series creator Chris Carter, and executive producer Frank Spotnitz; the teleplay was written by Carter. The episode was directed by Duchovny." A little messy. How about: The teleplay of the episode was written by Chris Carter, from a story by former series star David Duchovny, series creator Carter, and executive producer Frank Spotnitz
  • Could "The episode was directed by Duchovny. "William" be merge with the previous sentence
  • I know this might change everything else, but how about "The season centers on FBI special agents John Doggett (Robert Patrick), Monica Reyes (Annabeth Gish), and Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson)", rather than series. Because I see other articles that say it centers on Mulder and Scully
  • "Chris Owens was asked to return to the series for the episode. Owens' character had previously been killed off in the sixth season episode "One Son". How about: "Chris Owens was asked to return to the series for the episode, whose character had previously been killed off in the sixth season episode "One Son"

Plot

[edit]

Production

[edit]

Broadcast and reception

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  • No issues in such a small section.
    • Good work!

References

[edit]
[edit]

After these are fixed, I'd still recommend a copy-edit for the article, particularly in the "Plot" and "Reception" sections. Other than that, great work! TBrandley 05:25, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I went through and cleaned up the prose. Honestly, I don't see very many grammar errors though, so I don't think a full ce is necessary, but I could probably get Grapple to look it over if he has time. In the meantime, I've combed through it.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:12, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Maybe just a quick look. Thanks, TBrandley 17:13, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Grapple X has given it a copyedit and I've cut down on some of it. It should be good to go.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:37, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]