Talk:Wilkes Land crater

Australia: Antarctic Territory Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wilkes Land crater is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australian Antarctic Territory work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Antarctica: Australian Antarctic Territory Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Australian Antarctic Territory work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Removed this external link:

Theage.com.au: "Australia's meteoric rise" 4 June 2006

Completely unrelated to the article. Richard Branson 06:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To me, it looks so similar to the other articles that it offers nothing new, and decided not to revert. (It mentions Wilkes Land several times.) --Dhartung | Talk 07:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

are they sure it's old enough to have cause the PT extintion? that thing is big, but big anough to kill 90% of all life on earth?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.187.76.9 (talk • contribs)

The hype about it causing the PT extinction and the breakup of Gondwana are simply pre-mature speculations. The cited age range of between 500 and 100 mya is far to broad for any direct implications. Vsmith 14:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whole crater is nothing but hype. The circular mass concentration is the only proof that they have, and for goodness sake, impact craters on Earth are associated with negative gravity anomalies!--JyriL ^talk 19:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Considering it as an impact, I'd like to think of the ripples of energy waves across the globe as the tectonic plates were literally vibrated into a new volcanic era. So it may have just been a catalyst at that point, leading to a new toxic suffocation of current life and eventually a new ice age without the living warmth. Not much can survive in either event. So basically, with an impact like that, IF of course it was an impact, anything was possible and may have taken thousands or millions of years to complete. Heck, the Atlantic trench might be the crack in this big egg from which man finally emerged. LOL

TJ 03:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything to link this thing to the Permian-Triassic extinction event? If not, is it really our place at Wikipedia to speculate here (and on the front page, for God's sake) that it might've caused it? (I actually suspect it might have -- from the map, it looks to be roughly antipodal to the Siberian Traps (same latitude south as the vent in Norilsk is north, in fact, but only about 40 degrees further east rather than 180) known to be linked to that event, and impact waves could have been focused there. But where's more evidence?)--69.196.212.30 11:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phrasing

"Based on the presence of the mass concentration, the authors believe the structure must be less than 500 million years old."
Which authors?
Would it not be better to phrase this as "Based on the presence of the mass concentration, it is believed that the structure must be less than 500 million years old." with the relevant citation.
Without a citation, this is supposition. --203.13.128.102 04:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference added 3 Jan 07

Just added a reference to the 5 line non-refereed conference poster abstract that starting the media snowball going. It pre-dates the hasty media release, previously linked. To my knowledge nothing has appeared (yet) in the refereed scientific literature. Changed some wording to clarify some things and emphasize the speculative nature of the interpretations.PeterWH 14:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two Wilkes Land crater hypotheses

I've done some major edits to insert a fully referenced account of the earlier Wilkes Land crater hypothesis. I separated the two under headings Wilkes Land anomaly and Wilkes Land mascon because I think these terms are most faithful to the original sources. The first is really of historical interest only, but at least it has refereed journal sources, unlike the latter. PeterWH 05:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wilkes Land crater. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]