Talk:Wilhelm Keitel/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Fiamh (talk · contribs) 06:41, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• What makes Traces of War an RS?
  • Removed as these details were not significant. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Can we get a page number on ref #17 (Burleigh) for verifiability, or cut it if it's in the other ref?
  • Removed as duplicate. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Not related to GA criteria but one minor quibble with the lede: no need to say 'dependable sycophant and habitual "yes-man"', it's redundant.
  • Shortened. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
• Great work on this article!