Talk:Wilbraham, Massachusetts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

North Wilbraham

"North Wilbraham, Massachusetts" redirects here. It would be nice to have an explanation and a map. -- Beland 23:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think a North Wilbraham section will be good. It would also handle where to talk about the 01067 zip code. At the top, it's a little confusing that it looks like the current zip code. goodeye (talk) 15:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Misc

I have removed the reference to David Andrews as the President of the AHL. I am an AHL fan personally but I don't feel that it is appropriate to have his name on there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom991 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 7, 2012 vandalism

On May 7, 2012 someone decided to post some derogatory and disgusting stuff on the Wilbraham article. I would like to state that what was said was inappropriate and wrong! It is immature and it seems that people have too much time on there hands! Thank You tom991 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom991 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly's

The Friendly's discussion was getting scattered on user talk pages. I moved my question here.

My issue was the original deletion. I understand now the WP:BURDEN says I can't restore it by just saying citation needed (I thought that would be sufficient). But, I see citation-needed tags all the time. From this essay, it seems it shouldn't have been deleted, but should have tagged it instead, or at minimum moved it to this talk page for discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability/Removal_of_Uncited_Material goodeye (talk) 15:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also if I come up with sources, I want to state the topic is not trivial and not an advertisement - the company is a historically important part of town, and the bushes are a local landmark (citation needed). Perhaps the section needs lengthening, but the topic itself isn't trivial. goodeye (talk) 15:55, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]