Talk:Wilbour Papyrus
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wilbour Papyrus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Papyrus Wilbour from fr.wikipedia. |
Sources
[edit]I've added a very useful one as an EL. Doug Weller (talk) 14:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- The abstract to Katary's paper on land tenure[1] says "As the primary administrative document for New Kingdom land tenure, the Wilbour Papyrus, from Year 4 of Rameses V, documents the administration of cultivable land in Middle Egypt under temples and secular institutions located throughout Egypt." Doug Weller (talk) 16:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: History of Ancient Egypt
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2023 and 17 March 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): WesternGoblin (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Laumoos, RaccoonEnjoyer.
— Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 21:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: 311_History of Ancient Egypt
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2024 and 22 March 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Madrugada11 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Epichippo, Traven Murphy.
— Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 18:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
text a & text b
[edit]I added two different paragraphs in the content + purpose page in order to elaborate a bit further on the two primary sections in the Wilbour Papyrus. I used two new sources to add this information as well. I think it adds to the article because while text a and b are mentioned throughout the article I thought it would be fitting to add two specific sections dedicated to the two texts. Madrugada11 (talk) 13:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)