Talk:Wihtred of Kent

Wihtred of Kent is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 3, 2018.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 23, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 23, 2021.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Kent Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Mid‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Quote by Wihtred

There's a quote by Wihtred here that may be useful within the laws section. HansHermans 00:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I can't tell from the attribution, but it looks like it might be a translation of part of this. I'll do some more digging and see if I can find more about this. Thanks for the link. Mike Christie (talk) 10:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ecgberht's death

I'm a Spanish user (so sorry for my English) and I'm trasnlating the article to Spanish. I've found a posible mistake but I prefer to ask before. The article says that Ecgberht died in 675 but in his own article appears tha he died in 673 that is more consistent with the facts. Thanks. --Millars (talk) 12:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article says Ecgberht died in 673; can you point to where it says 675? Mike Christie (talk) 12:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the first sentence of "Kent in the late seventh century" section. --Millars (talk) 00:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It says "The dominant force in late seventh-century politics south of the River Humber was Wulfhere of Mercia, who reigned from the late 650s to 675. The king of Kent for much of this time was Ecgberht, who died in 673." It's Wulfhere who died in 675; Ecgberht died in 673. So I'm still not clear what the problem is. Mike Christie (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ups, It's ok, it was a terrible confusion with the names, sorry. --Millars (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

name of son

His third sons name was Alric not Ælfric. See [1] Chapter XXIII

These are names are not equivalent to each other. Since this article is featured I'm giving a warning before I change it. Kjhskj75 (talk) 20:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I checked a couple of sources and I agree. It looks like this is an error that's been here for many years; it predates the work that was done to feature the article. Since this error is in a lot of places (including other language wikis) I'd like to wait and see if anyone has some reason for the Ælfric spelling. I'll post a note at WT:Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms as well. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are completely different names ie: one is not just a variant of the other.

Ælf - ric = Elf ruler

Al - ric = Noble regal ruler Wilfridselsey (talk) 10:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Query

The third son is shown as Ælfric in the text and Alric in the infobox. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to look at the sources for this, if not tonight then tomorrow. I evidently forgot to come back to this -- see the section above. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:49, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now fixed; I don't have access to the ODNB, but Bede, the other source, shows "Alric", and that's where the link goes from the only instance of Ælfric, so this appears to be just a mistake of some kind. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Of Kent Wihtred" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Of Kent Wihtred. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]