Talk:Wieferich prime/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 10:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
~~What does "≡" means? If and only if? And "∤" means "restriction to"?~~
"≡" in the context of this article denotes a congruence on the integers. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"∤" here means "does not divide" (it is listed at List of mathematical symbols#Symbols). -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wikilinked the symbol "∤" to an article where it is explained. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~"log log x" a word too much or intentional?~~
This is intentional. It denotes the logarithm of the logarithm of x. I added parentheses for clarity here. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Similar uncommon units should be linked~~
What in particular do you think should be linked? -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Can you explain what does the small omega in the second table refers to? If you do this I am happy to pass this article.~~
Explained in this edit. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 20:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Red links should be created or explained in the article (for example, I don't know what a "Catalan pseudoprime" is)~~
Redlinks First case of Fermat's last theorem and Catalan pseudoprime eliminated by creating those articles. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 20:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Non-english sources should be labelled as such.~~
Done. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 19:25, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest to remove the red links in the reference section, as it is unlikely they will be created.
Done. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 19:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Overall ok
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: ~~On hold to give you time fixing the problems.--GoP _T ^C _N 11:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)~~ Pass[reply]
Pass/Fail:

(Note): My common practice is to paste the template into the GAN. I often check points 5 and 6 (stability and pictures) before reviewing because they are easy to check. "Neutral" is confusing, as it may also mean that I did not review this points. Ok, now I will resume my review :)--GoP _T ^C _N 11:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]