Talk:Wichita people

Oklahoma Mid‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

http://www.wichita.edu/thisis/stories/story.asp?si=3617

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 10 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Terencewtli.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kitikiti'sh or kiriki:r?is

Since the 03:00, March 17, 2005 revision by long-retired anonymous User 203.45.230.188 the article uses the Wichita word "kiriki:r?is" (am I missing some odd UNICODE or IPA thing here?).

Horrors! This is being picked up in sources which derive from Wikipedia.

The Native American encyclopedias I have checked use the term "Kitikiti'sh" or "Kitikitish" for the Wichita's name for themselves.

I am changing it, only because it looks like a "scanno"

Searchable Sources on Amazon:

A Native American Encyclopedia : History, Culture, and Peoples http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0195138775

Oklahoma Atlas & Gazetteer http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0899332838

Native America in the Twentieth Century : An Encyclopedia (Garland Reference Library of Social Science) http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0815325835

Caltrop 01:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In Popular Culture

In an online social network website tribe.net [1], "Wichita" is a default tribe of all newly registered users.

Date issue?

"In 1890, it was estimated that there were about 3,200 total Wichita. By 1868, the population is recorded as being 572 total Wichita. By the time of the census of 1937, there were only 100 Wichita officially left." This seems to indicate that there were more Wichita in 1890 than in 1868, which is contradictory to the statement that the populations dwindled as they had more contact with white culture. Maybe the dates 1890/1868 are transversed or incorrect?

Poor source

This source does not seem to be written by a professional historian. "BA in Anthropology from Southwest Texas State University" Fred Talk 21:38, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wichita people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120512000000/http://www.ok.gov/oiac/documents/2011.FINAL.WEB.pdf to http://www.ok.gov/oiac/documents/2011.FINAL.WEB.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wichita people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100701184559/http://www.wichitatribe.com/wichita_tribe_home.htm to http://www.wichitatribe.com/wichita_tribe_home.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/D/Richard.R.Drass-1/washita.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]