This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
Hi Legacypac
Thank you for reviewing the draft of my article about Wi-Charge. As novice Wikipedia writer I might be missing a point, but I made all the effort not to make the article about the company to look commercial. In fact, I see many articles on Wikipedia (take a look on uBeam for example) that are by far more "commercial" and yet passed reviewers. In any case, I submitted the article again with additional changes. This article is being referenced by the Wireless Power Transfer article as it is yet another technology that allows delivering power at distance. For all claims in the article I provided valid references IMO. Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shual06 (talk • contribs) 09:17, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Add sources for everything written. Add anything you can find written about the company by independent sources unconnected to the company. Legacypac (talk) 09:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. All sources are independent and are not connected to the company. Articles from CNET, Forbes, IEEE. International standards. Shual06 (talk) 15:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is a unique technology. No one have done something similar. IEEE Spectrum that I referenced is a scientific paper. Shual06 (talk) 13:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've accepted the draft based on good independant coverage of the company. I can't see an applicable CSD criteria so there is no reason to leave it in draft. Legacypac (talk) 05:44, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
