Talk:Who's That Girl (Madonna song)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. I was a fan of Madonna in high school (even had a picture in my locker for a spell), but I'll try not to let my bias influence this GAR :) To save us both time, I'll make minor edits as I go along, and bring the other stuff up for discussion here. My wiki-plate is pretty full, so the review may take a few days. Cheers, Sasata (talk) 02:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Update: I've done a fairly extensive copyedit of the prose. Review the changes and revert anything you don't agree with, and also check if I've inappropriately altered the meaning. Will be back in a day or two with the actual review (and probably more copyediting). Sasata (talk) 02:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Wonderful! I checked and its fine. --Legolas (talk2me) 06:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok, have made a few more small tweaks to the article prose. I checked out some of the online sources, and mostly everything checks out. One comment:
- "It was also featured on the promotional-only instore video compilations It's That Girl and She's Breathless.[24][25]" These citations are to Wikipedia articles, which is to be avoided. Can you find another print or web source that says the same?
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Prose is reasonably well written; article complies with MOS.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):
- The citations to online sources I checked were fine.
Citations to wiki articles need to be removed or replaced.
- The citations to online sources I checked were fine.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Coverage is comparable to other similar song articles.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article accurately represents the mixed critical response the song received.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- I believe the fair-use rationale to be appropriate for the two images included.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
:Pending fix to self-reference. Sasata (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Meets GA criteria, article promoted. Sasata (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply. I replaced that link with that from Andrew Metz's book. It has a list of all the videos and the tracklists. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)