Jump to content

Talk:Who's That Girl (1987 film)/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:--CallMeNathanTalk2Me I think this article was unfairly failed last time. Editors weren't even given a chance. I don't think its fair for Legs to wait any longer :)--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 08:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ughh, dopnt call me Legs, as it is my wife uses that to tease me for my online name. — Legolas (talk2me) 09:27, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, gotcha :) Beginning review--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 04:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • I think "produced by WB" is better
  • Weird tense issues. Madonna played -> plays, was sent -> is sent
  • hometown Philadelphia -> of
  • wanted -> wants
  • capture the people who framed her, and both of them get caught -> doesn't flow well
  • till -> until
  • was on halt -> halted
  • eight years ago -> prior
  • grossing in total of US $25 million, by playing in front of an audience of 1.5 million. -> Its not "an" audience, its not only one show, its various happening at different times. Also, reword a bit
  • and Foley as a director -> and Foley's direction
  • first week -> opening

Plot

[edit]
  • characteristic look -> ?
  • helps her find -> help
  • the mountain lion -> don't see how this fits in. I haven't heard anything about it before now. What significance does it hold?
  • There Nikki and Loudon -> there,
  • expresses -> express
  • Honestly, the last paragraph doesn't make much sense. I have not seen the film, and have a pretty good understanding until the last paragraph.
  • I don't see what purpose the free-media photo serves except eye-candy. It has no mention whatsoever in the section and really holds no significant importance, therefore failing I believe criteria 3a.
    • It has mention in the filming and production section. A non-free image not necessarily has to be in that particular section, kinda like artwork and posters, even when their rationale and commentary may bein a separate section. And how can free-media images fail #3a? That is for NFCC, not commons. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Development

[edit]
  • Madonna's 1986 studio album True Blue was a critical and commercial success, spawning five top-five singles, and selling over eight million copies worldwide, by the year-end -> don't see why this is necessary to include, but if you prefer it, then leave it, I won't stop you.
  • as she wanted it to be -> she had hoped

Casting

[edit]
  • Good

Filming

[edit]
  • About her acting abilities -> regarding
  • shooting the major scenes involving Madonna were over -> re-write
  • in the set -> on

Release and promotion

[edit]
  • celebration was planned -> planned makes it sound like it never happened, which it obviously did
  • Musically and technically superior -> how so musically?
  • huge -> I personally don't like the word huge
  • Madonna named the tour as Who's That Girl, when during rehearsals one-day she looked at a gigantic image of herself, projected on a screen on the stage -> I don't get it
  • U.S. -> US - MOS
  • audience -> audience members
  • was the second top female concert -> top selling

Critical response

[edit]
  • The film received mixed reviews from critics -> you wrote before it was a "critical failure"
  • First quote is a bit long. Should paraphrase or reduce bulk, or blockquote.

Critical reception

[edit]
  • a total of 944 theaters -> you wrote 1,000 before. Be consistent.
  • once incident -> one
  • Source for Razzys?

Soundtrack

[edit]
  • uptempo song and a downtempo song -> other wording would be better

References

[edit]
  • Some of your Harvard links are broken, like #49

Overall

[edit]