Talk:Whitney & Company (Leominster, Massachusetts)

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

With me this company's not suitable to write in Wikipedia.Nnq2603 (talk) 04:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The site is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, therefore prima facie notable. Swampyank (talk) 21:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about this location makes this location any more notable than the National Register of Historic Places itself? Wikipedia is not a collection of random lists of information. This article needs more references and information about the company to be notable. Crickel (talk) 15:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]