Talk:White propaganda
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article used to be a tiny mess, but I fixed it up a tad. It may be wise to redirect this to the main propaganda article.
designation of "white" vs "black"
[edit]I suggest that using the term "white" to convey honesty in the present article is inherently racist, perhaps vestigial from when racism was accepted. I suggest a more apt designation in how we use language to describe things.
In this sense I propose that we use "honest propaganda" in contrast to "dishonest propaganda". A sweeping change across our language would not be apt as a "little honest lie" does not convey that the lie was minute. --S.mielnik (talk) 02:59, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- No such thing as an "honest lie". That is a contradiction in terms. 2A00:23C5:FE0C:2100:75BF:1626:C21B:BF7A (talk) 20:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Media articles
- Low-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- Stub-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Stub-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Stub-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Stub-Class military history articles
- Stub-Class intelligence articles
- Intelligence task force articles