Talk:Where Is the Feeling?
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Where Is the Feeling? article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Where Is the Feeling? has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 16, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Where Is the Feeling?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061010162812/http://www.kylie.co.uk/minography/mixes.shtml to http://www.kylie.co.uk/minography/mixes.shtml
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chartstats.com/release.php?release=22939
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Where Is the Feeling?/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 15:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
I'll review this article over the next day or two. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 15:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- I've written the initial review. A few small things that need to be fixed. The only major one is that the "critical response" section needs to be rewritten, as it's currently just a collection of quotes. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:31, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- 11JORN this review has been open for over a week. Are you interested in bringing it to GA, or should I close the review as unsuccessful? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thebiguglyalien Hi! Actually I've been a little busy, I think I'm gonna be able to fix the issues tomorrow. Is that OK? Alex reach me! 19:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- 11JORN yeah, there's no rush. I just wanted to see what your plan was. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thebiguglyalien I think all the issues have been addressed. Take a look. Alex reach me! 02:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- It looks like all of the criteria are met. I would still prefer more paraphrasing in the critical response section, but that's not enough to hold it back from GA. I'll pass the review now. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thebiguglyalien I think all the issues have been addressed. Take a look. Alex reach me! 02:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- 11JORN yeah, there's no rush. I just wanted to see what your plan was. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thebiguglyalien Hi! Actually I've been a little busy, I think I'm gonna be able to fix the issues tomorrow. Is that OK? Alex reach me! 19:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- 11JORN this review has been open for over a week. Are you interested in bringing it to GA, or should I close the review as unsuccessful? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Well-written
- The main issue here is that the critical response section uses too many quotes. This is a common issue with music articles, and WP:RECEPTION is a helpful guide for fixing this.
pursued through the water by an ominous figure
– This phrase is used twice, but I'm not sure if it's the best choice of wording. The citation is broken, so I can't check what it says.- Who or what is Within a Dream? This needs more context.
it was suggested that if anyone had any good ideas for covers
– This does not make sense grammatically. A better wording might be "it was asked if anyone had ideas for cover songs".Dave Seaman, a member of British duo Brothers in Rhythm, felt the song was a "perfect fit" for the record
– It should clarify that he was a producer so the reader isn't confused.Frankie Knuckles and David Morales' classic musical elements
– It isn't clear what this means. Maybe say that they "drew on their previous work" or something like that.
- Verifiable with no original research
The album version of "Where Is the Feeling?" received positive reviews from music critics, who described it as "soulful".
– Quotes should be cited, even if they're in the lead. In this case, it should only be in the lead if this is a consensus among critics rather than just a quote from one critic.- The sources seem to indicate that Brothers in Rhythm were only involved in the single version, but the article doesn't make that distinction.
- They actually produced both versions Alex reach me! 02:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- What makes AdrianDenning.co.uk a reliable source?
- Removed Alex reach me! 02:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Goodall & Stanley-Clarke 2012 is not associated with a source.
Spotchecks:
- [1] Harrison (2015) – Good, but make sure the words in the article aren't too similar to the source.
- [4] Harrison (2014) – This source doesn't support some of the things in its first use. A minor issue if it's covered by the other citations there, but it's worth noting. Other use is good.
- [8] Martin (2020) – This doesn't seem to be relevant in its first use. The other two uses are good.
- [9] Jones (1995) – The article steals the wording of "heavy use of orchestra" from the source, which creates a plagiarism issue. Otherwise good.
- [15] Adams (2018) – Good.
- Broad in its coverage
Covers production, release, composition, and reception.
- Neutral
Does not give undue weight to any opinion or critic.
- Stable
No recent content disputes in the edit history or the talk page.
- Illustrated
The album cover has a valid non-free use rationale.
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- GA-Class Australian music articles
- Low-importance Australian music articles
- WikiProject Australian music articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- GA-Class song articles
- GA-Class Kylie Minogue articles
- High-importance Kylie Minogue articles
- WikiProject Kylie Minogue articles
- GA-Class electronic music articles
- Low-importance electronic music articles
- WikiProject Electronic music articles
- GA-Class Women in music articles
- Low-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles