Talk:Wheelie bike
 | A fact from Wheelie bike appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
_pictogram.svg){kind=small}
Stub?
[edit]Hmmm. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition seems a little harsh.
Before I just change the rating, perhaps we can itemize what the article has and lacks:
- Has
-
- References: books, recognized experts, newspaper articles, etc. All of it with URLs for casual verification.
- History: who, when, where, and how much.
- Features: wheels, saddles, handlebars, tires, brakes, gearing, shifting, add-ons.
- Other: sales amounts, global reach, safety issues, manufacturers, variations.
- Pictures: decent representation from the two primary brands.
- Lacks
-
- More pictures
- More information about the people involved.
Is not useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study a better description? -AndrewDressel (talk) 13:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- You're more than welcome to change the rating, I rated a few hundred unassessed articles today and only really had a matter of seconds to do each. Mistakes do happen. Taking a second look, I would rate this article as Start-Class. The first criteria of C-Class is The article is substantial which I don't see here. But you're more than welcome to change it to whatever you like. SeveroTC 13:52, 7 July 2010 (UTC)