Talk:Wheaton Academy

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notes

Do you think that the references tag can be removed? I added more citations and took away some uncitable material. Muffin of the English (talk) 21:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article could use even more references, the fine arts sections needs to be written in a neutral point of view, and the trivia section would be better placed in a History section. Also consider creating an academics/curriculum section. Overall, a pretty well organized start. Good luck, --Jh12 (talk) 15:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)}} This page is currently in the making. I should be done with it in a few days. B89smith 23:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to change the title of this article to Wheaton Academy instead of Wheaton Academy.
- Done. --Core desat 07:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does the fine arts section sound like an advertizing brocure to anyone else? Delian31 (talk) 01:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Yeah and from the first two sentences it sounds like the school needs to get a few more thesauruses. Gtbob12 (talk) 21:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC) This article has been vandalized a bit recently, might be a good idea to revert to a previous edition. 24.14.183.210 (talk) 03:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sports section is poorly written and sounds more like an outdated news article. Can someone please clean this section up? The golf section is the most egregious. --Tphollingsworth (talk) 17:51, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Walogo.jpg

Image:Walogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]