Talk:Wheat Growers Hotel

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Nebraska portal This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2013 feature series in a Nebraska newspaper

This 3-part newspaper series in may prove useful in expanding this article.

Nisener, Jacob; Thompson, Daniel (2013-05-09). "Wheat Growers Hotel is more than brick and mortar: Nearly a century later, Cunningham's monument lingers on". The Western Nebraska Observer. Vol. 128, no. 55. Retrieved 2013-06-09., part 1 of a 3-part series
Nisener, Jacob; Thompson, Daniel (2013-05-30). "Railroads, dust and grasshoppers - memories of the Wheat Growers Hotel". The Western Nebraska Observer. Vol. 128, no. 58. Retrieved 2013-06-09., part 2 of a 3-part series
The third part is scheduled for publication in June 2013.

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 20:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

photos and placement

It would help the article to have more photos of wheat details, such as a sheaf of wheat in mosaic design inside the building, per linked NRHP nom doc photo set. This is largely what the building is notable for.

For the moment, having a 2nd photo in the article which shows the "Wheat Growers" text in mosaic at the front is best available support beyond pic of front of building. About photo placement, there is a wikipedia guideline wp:IMAGELOCATION mentioned in an edit summary that suggests about placement, but certainly does not prohibit multiple photos in an article. I restored the photo that was just removed to a different location now. I preferred the previous location; adding to the right however. Whatever. Keep the photo in though, it supports the article. --do ncr am 21:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how a second photo showing the name of the hotel illustrates the "wheat" theme. I'd expect that the name of a hotel would occur in several places: on the sign in front; on or behind the front counter; on the towels; &c. For example, I could work the local Motel 6 and get photos of "Motel 6" occurring in several places in the building; but that wouldn't support a statement that the hotel had a hexafold theme.

Per MOS:LEAD, "...the lead section may contain optional elements presented in the following order: disambiguation links (dablinks), maintenance tags, infoboxes, foreign character warning boxes, images,..." I'm removing the image before the infobox in accordance with this.

If it's desirable to add more photos, I'd suggest lengthening the article. A section on Kimball's history would be very appropriate; it'd also be a good thing to discuss the agriculture of Kimball County by way of explaining how the hotel's name is appropriate. Once the article text extended well below the bottom of the infobox, there'd be room for more illustrations. Ammodramus (talk) 03:08, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]