Talk:What Were We Thinking Of/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 21:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

twenty-ninth studio album → you should write "29th" as numbers above 10 should not be written out
of a relationship that has, over time, soured → of a relationship that has soured over time
the song was well received → the song was well-received
On the Adult Contemporary chart → On Billboard's Adult Contemporary component chart
it peaked at number 32. → use "What Were We Thinking Of" here to avoid repeating yourself

Infobox

Flawless ;)

Recording and release

twenty-ninth studio album → same as in the lead
and it was one of the first songs written by Armato → counting among the first ones to be penned by Armato
because he is "very musical → because he was "very musical
she also was interested → she was also interested

Lyrics and production

Like the bulk of the songs → Like the majority of the songs
and how to move on in life from them → this sounds quite unencyclopedic; can you find another way to say it?
Streisand sings, "Where did → Lyrics of the track include: "Where did

Reception

but it did reach the same → but did reach the same
Everything else is well-written ;)

Track listing

Flawless ;)

Charts

Flawless ;)

Other stuff

Copy-violation

5.7% is great!

References

As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article
No dead links! Good job!

Outcome

On hold for 7 days! Well-done!! Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon network freak – I finished this one. Nice working with you again. Have a nice holiday, Carbrera (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Gladly passing this great effort! Congrats; Cartoon network freak (talk) 22:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.