Talk:What's My Name? (Rihanna song)

Hot 100

How can this song be on the Hot 100 if it hasn't been released on itunes or amazon yet? Thanks.--61.68.140.156 (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

The Hot 100 is calculated by adding Sales (digital) to Sales (physical) and Airplay. Hence a song can chart via airplay before you can purchase it. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 01:19, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Ska?!

Obviously the person putting this as the genre doesn't even know what ska is!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.137.238.253 (talk) 10:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Do you have a reliable source claiming otherwise? Yves (talk) 18:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Ok seriously f*** the source I mean this song is obviusly not ska maybe a little bit ragga and dancehall like Rude Boy but Ska is just common sense that the one who said that song is ska doesn't know what it is, the song sounds mostly like europop and R&B maybe dancehall and ragga incluenced but not ska at all..source? me! cause I'm musician. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.14.29.43 (talk) 00:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

The reviewer who called the song Ska is from AOL Radio and has been working there for a number of years as a DJ/radio host. His/her analysis of the song clearly says "Over strobing Ska-infused beats...". People need to stop being narrow-minded and accept that other genres exist outside of R&B, Pop and Dance. Critically the US does not have charts for every song out there... e.g. Reggae or Dancehall Charts which we can access therefore inevitably songs like this will get played on other stations. Obviously Rihanna is an urban artist so mainstream urban and R&B stations will play her music and thus it will chart on Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart. Wikipedia's own article on Ska says "Ernest Ranglin described the difference between the R&B and the ska beat is that the former goes "chink-ka" and the latter goes "ka-chink". Its obvious that this song has that kind of beat so AOL Radio's analysis of the song is not incorrect. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 00:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Also you might want to tone it down a litte. Swearing is not going to get you anywhere. And as a final word Only Girl (In the World) was Europop however there is clearly a different vocal and production genre with "What's My Name?". In no way is the latter similar to the former. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 00:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

So you only have ONE source that claims it to be "ska". But wait..it isn't even that. It's "Ska-infused beats". It's obviously NOT a ska song. You want ska? Listen to The Specials or even Reel Big Fish. THAT'S ska. This song is obviously not a ska song. You might want to study musical genres more. Just saying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.147.0.223 (talk) 03:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not interpret things or report original research. If you have another reliable source that says something different, feel free to suggest it. Yves (talk) 03:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Time to stop being so prideful and change the genre. It's okay to be wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.137.226.51 (talk) 10:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

I agree, as a Caribbean person raised and reared on ska, reggae, calypso, soca and the like, this song is not *pure* ska, but it's clearly ska and/or dancehall-influenced. I'm happy with ANY reference to the obviously Caribbean-derived influence of the backbeat (the "ka-chink" as Lil-Unique says) on this song. I say, take what you can get! Thank heaven for small mercies! mikomango (talk) 01:38, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The source given concerns a remix version of What's My Name? This has nothing to do with the released/original format. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 20:53, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

The remix is the original. Prior plans were to have a solo version of the song on the album, with the Drake version being a remix and a bonus track on Loud, but this has changed. There exists no solo version of the song and the "remix" is now the standard version. Yves (talk) 21:00, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

You're trying to say that What's My Name? is ska? A genre that inspired Bob Marley and the entire concept reggae. I am sorry but there seems to a severe error. The source obviously lacks credibility and reliability here. I suggest it to be changed to R&B. There are far more sources that can support that that meets the WP:Reliability and WP:Credibility terms. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 01:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

I did not say that. Yves (talk) 01:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Song Length

Where does the 4:24 length come from? What I've seen from the album has a length of 4:16 or 4:17. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lochsa (talk • contribs) 03:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

The single length. Yves (talk) 03:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm confused. The Single page and the Loud album page both lists the track at 4:24. A full album download I looked at indicated a length of 4:16. Lochsa (talk) 16:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Amazon.com lists it as 4:23. Yves (talk) 16:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Charts

The song debuted in the ultratop in belgium http://www.ultratop.be/nl/showitem.asp?interpret=Rihanna+feat%2E+Drake&titel=What%27s+My+Name%3F&cat=s--206.248.66.250 (talk) 19:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Happy to oblige! (mikomango (talk) 07:56, 22 November 2010 (UTC))

UK Charts

the song debuted in the UK R&B Chart source —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.66.250 (talk) 19:09, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Happy to help. (mikomango (talk) 07:43, 22 November 2010 (UTC))

Whats My Name is NINTH #1, not Eighth

It has at the top of the article that Whats My Name is Rihanna's 8th number on the Hot 100, whens it her ninth. I am changing it to 'ninth', don't change it back (S.O.S, Umbrella, Take A Bow, Disturbia, Rude Boy, Only Girl, Whats My Name, Live Your Life, Love The Way You Lie = 9!) calvin999 (talk) 20:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Actually, eighth is correct. "Only Girl (in the World)" was number one after this one, which makes that one her ninth. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 20:47, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, it depends on how you look at then. Because it is a bit confusing to see the next single say 8th and the previous say 9th, because its never happened before. Personally, I look upon it as the next single after Only Girl, therefore next #1. calvin999 (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

But it's not: it's her eight and "Only Girl (In the World)" is her ninth. How do you know it's never happened before? And you can't just change the order things happened. Yves (talk) 23:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Everyone knows she broke a record by having the second single peak at #1 before the lead single peaked at #1.calvin999 (talk) 14:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

I don't. Where is your verifiable reliable source? Yves (talk) 22:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

http://rihannalatesthairstyles.blogspot.com/2010/11/rihanna-sets-chart-records-with-ninth.html third paragraph. calvin999 (talk) 00:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Not reliable. Yves (talk) 00:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Number One on Canadian Hot 100

The song has yet to reach number one in Canada, the source provided proves that "Only Girl (In the World)" was number one in Canada for that week. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.211.107 (talk) 03:07, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Genre Revert

The first genre listed as ska cannot be supported by the providing link which isthis because that article talks about a remix of the song What's My Name? I'm sorry but the second genre listed as electronica can be disputed in the supporting link from 4Music which is a review of Loud and no where states the song is Electronica, for references checkthis link. AllMusic is meets the WP: Credibility and WP:Reliability criteria and while it's a summation of the entire album, the genre is more closely linked to this article than your provided sources. I request it is made to either Pop or R&B because ska is pre-reggae and anyone can tell this is not any form of ska. Electronica deals with a huge amount of electronic beats, examples may include Lights. A consensus is need to be made for this because currently the genres listed can be and are disputed. Kevon100 ^Talk!_{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 20:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

The remix and official version are the same, the only difference is Drake's rap. So the production and everything else is in tact. Electronica is also supported by the refs, so everything checks out to be fine. Candyo32 - Merry CHRISTmas :) 02:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Well the source given stated that the song has "an electronic edge", this does not mean it's electronica by any means. As far as I see it, the listing of electronica as a genre can be disputed. Since it has charted on R&B charts, is it safe to put the genre as R&B or even Pop? I am sure there can be some general consensus for this topic. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 16:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Removing Ska & Electronica from genre

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested for comment. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was that the current sources provided do not support the inclusion of Ska or Reggae as genres (in infobox or categorization) for this song. They should, instead, be mentioned in the composition section. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 03:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

---

Genre inclusion debate. Some editors believe the song should be tagged as ska and electronica. Other editors disagree. Reasons outlined on talk page. --175.140.9.20 (talk) 14:54, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

It is original research to conclude that "ska-infused beats" means a song's genre is ska. Two different concepts. Do you people even know what infused means? It means to introduce, to dip, to pour in. The article is basically saying that one element of the song - i.e. the beats - has a bit of ska in it. That's all. It does NOT say that the beat is ska because otherwise there would be no need for the word infused. It does NOT say that the entire song has been infused with ska otherwise there would be no need for the word beats. It does NOT say that the entire song is ska, otherwise there would be no need for the words infused and beats. Brush up on your English, people. --175.137.78.224 (talk) 14:00, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Likewise, it is original research to conclude that "the song has an electronic edge" means the song is electronica. Electronic is not even synonymous with electronicA. There are many electronic music that do not fit under the electronica tag - including industrial music or avantgarde works from composers like John Cage or Stockhausen. If for some strange reason, any of you is really determined to tag this song as ska or electronica, find a reliable source that actually describe the song as ska or electronica, period. Not infused or edge or whatever. Do not use your own original research to get from one thing to another. --175.137.78.224 (talk) 14:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

The reviewer who called the song Ska is from AOL Radio and has been working there for a number of years as a DJ/radio host. His/her analysis of the song clearly says "Over strobing Ska-infused beats...". People need to stop being narrow-minded and accept that other genres exist outside of R&B, Pop and Dance. Critically the US does not have charts for every song out there... e.g. Reggae or Dancehall Charts which we can access therefore inevitably songs like this will get played on other stations. Obviously Rihanna is an urban artist so mainstream urban and R&B stations will play her music and thus it will chart on Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart. Wikipedia's own article on Ska says "Ernest Ranglin described the difference between the R&B and the ska beat is that the former goes "chink-ka" and the latter goes "ka-chink". Its obvious that this song has that kind of beat so AOL Radio's analysis of the song is not incorrect. According to wikipedia's own article on Ska... "It is characterized by a walking bass line accented with rhythms on the upbeat."

As for electronica ... our articles say "Electronic music is music that employs electronic musical instruments and electronic music technology in its production. Allmusic categorises electronica as a top-level genre on their main page, where they state that electronica includes danceable grooves to music for headphones and chillout areas." if outkast and kanye west's recent work can be classified as Electronica then so can Rihanna per the official sources given. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 17:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

To satisfy our WP:IDHT friends... I've managed to find a source which calls is electro-R&B. Combined with the sources we've now got I've reclassfied the genres as R&B, ska, electronic. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 17:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't electro-R&B settle for both R&B and electronica? Just a mere suggestion. My main point in this post is just to ask how does the line "ska-infused beats" at all means ska is one of the genre of the song? Clarification is needed here because I just do not understand how that works. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 22:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

ska-infused implies that there is a ska beat running through the song which is true. By musical composition, ska is very beat heavy. infuse means to "soak or mix". Therefore the beat is mixed/soaked in Ska. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 22:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough! Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 23:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry but I'm not the one here who is being tendentious and refusing to get the point. "Ska-infused beats" is not synonymous with "ska song". You are conflating the two. Describing one element of a song as infused with ska is not the same thing as describing the entire song as ska. Likewise, saying a song has an electronic edge is not the same thing as saying that the song is part of the electronicA genre. Clearly, you are fans of Rihanna. That's fine. So am I. But there's no need to get all pretentious and make it seem as if this song is more genre-encompassing than it really is. You are on very thin grounds here - a single solitary source, one that's quite dubious coming from a blog, mention in passing that a solitary element of a song happens to be infused by ska. That's not the same thing as tagging the song as Ska and to suggest otherwise is to engage in original research. Likewise, most modern pop songs today have an "electronic edge". That does not mean all pop songs are part of the Electronica genre. Considering how popular this #1 hit is, you would expect that there would be a lot more sources out there explicitly and directly describing the song as Ska or Electronica if it is so - without any need for any of you to misinterpret one thing for another thing. Anyway, I have asked for advice from the no orignal research notice board: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Rihanna.27s_What_My_Name --175.144.72.233 (talk) 08:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

The above unregistered user has a point. Why don't we just set it to R&B and call it a day? I am fine with electronica being a part of the listing because at the end of the day, it's all electronic-generated beats. But ska? No. I simply couldn't come to terms with that for this song. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 13:27, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Multiple sources have said the song has electronic elements hence I changed electronica → electronic, there is ONE source calling the song R&B and one mentioning Ska and Electro. Ska-infused beats is the same as beats mixed with Ska. That clearly shows that the song has elements of SKA. So many of the sources mention Rihanna's Carribean influences on the song so I really dont understand why you are so against having Ska as a sourced genre when it is form of music generated in the Carribean. The source given is AOL Radio Blog - a big radio station and music entertainment website from the united states with professional and experienced editors and disc jockeys. It is not your standard run-of-the-mill blog run by some teenager in their bedroom. You are simply saying that because the song charted on the R&B charts it is an R&B song... genres don't work like that... -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 18:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Please give these "multiple sources". And how can we assume that "ska-infused beats is the same as beats mixed with Ska"? Wikipedia is not a place to display original research as stated by the WP:OR. I am sorry but how do the genres work? There is a source that it is R&B...secondly, it has to be an R&B song to chart on its respective chart? correct? If not do enlighten me how a ska song charts on the R&B chart. The AOL staff may be very experienced to determine genres however "ska infused beats does not imply it is ska!" Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 19:29, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Songs can be and often are more than one genre. Songs chart in the US especially, are not determined by genre. A song will chart on R&B charts is R&B stations choose to play it regardless of whether sources call it an R&B song or not. That is why "Poker Face" by lady Gaga charted on some R&B charts around the world even though its quite clearly not an R&B song no review/source mentions R&B. Billboard doesn't have charts for every genre. There is no Ska or Ragga chart for example. This argument is getting quite ridiculous. If you look at The Oxford Dictionary it even says the definitions of infuse as: "to fill, to pervade (be present and apparent throughout), to soak". Thus Ska-infused beats means ska-filled beats, ska-pervaded beats or ska-soaked beats. Either way the three definitions show that one element of the song - its beats - are of ska in nature. And thus it is not WP:OR to call the song Ska. Songs have more than one genre, this song consists of R&B vocals, ska-beats and electronic instrumentations. You're now arguing tooth and nail that the song isn't Ska even though it clearly says that the song's beats are ska. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 19:39, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Also remember that WP:Other stuff exists is not an argument for inclusion or exclusion but "Poker Face" is a good example of why charts do not determine a genre. Its genres and charts are all sourced and the article is a WP:Good article otherwise I wouldn't use it as an example. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 19:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. Charts named after a genre are not indicative of genre; in this case, it simply means stations and outlets designated as R&B by Nielsen are spinning and playing the song. Yves (talk) 20:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Songs can be and often are more than one genre (as Lil pointed out above), as with this song. The song is R&B, ska, electronic. RnB may be the dominant genre but that is not a valid reason for exclusion of two other sourced genres. If a reviewer calls a song Ska infused that means that the song features elements of Ska, its not he dominant genre but its still a genre used in the song. Do not remove it again. And Kevon, i would be care as i have a funny feeling that this IP may be you, its very suspicious that he would bring this up and two hours later after not editing for awhile you immediately jump in and defend this IP's view. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:09, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Your funny feeling is premature, that IP can be traced in Indonesia; I'm in Barbados...where Rihanna was born. It's fair enough that ska is left in the listing. Thank you. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 23:56, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

I guess consensus is reached, but I have to agree that it is silly to note that other genres are not notable, just because they are not the primary genre of the song. And how crap is this argument that all Rihanna songs are R&B? Ridiculous. She is one of the most varying genred artist we have today, more so than what Knowles has engaged into. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:22, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Consensus has not been reached. I'm not the same person as Kevon100 and anyone suggesting otherwise clearly has not bothered to read this talk page: Kevon1000 only disputes the inclusion of Electronica as a genre. I dispute both Ska & Electronica. I am aware that songs can be of multiple genres. If any of you can find a source that clearly, directly, explicitly and unequivocally describes the song as Ska or Electronica, then this issue can be easily settled. None of you have thus far found such a source. Instead, you have to rely on something that does not clearly, directly, explicitly or unequivocally describes the song as such. Since I have received no feedback from the No Original Research notice board, I have added a request for comment tag on this section. --175.140.9.20 (talk) 09:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

For the last time.... ELECTRONICA has been removed and replaced with electronic per the digital spy review.-- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 15:26, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Electronic is NOT a genre of music. There are tonnes of artists who use electronics to make their music like Lady Gaga, Jay-Z, Lil Wayne, Kanye West, Kesha etc. but "electronic" or "electronica" never appears as a genre for them, right? It's more or less an umbrella term used to categorize almost any form of music containing use of electronics. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 17:30, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Rihanna is not one of the most varied artists in terms of genre in the music world. All Rihanna songs are either contemporary R&B or they have a significant amount of cont. r&b properties in her music. But I can settle for ska being in the listing as well as electronica since they do hint in their sources that What's My Name contains these elements hence can be classified under the track as a subgenre. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 14:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

I think someone has neglected to read WP:Other stuff exists. What is done with other artists is not relevant to this article. The review from digital spy calls the song electro-R&B. Electro is short for the world Electronic. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 17:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Artists don't define the genre of their songs... their songs define the genre of the artist. Since you're so keen on mentioning Kanye West, critics did speak of how 808&Heartbreaks had electronic elements to it. On wikipedia we had an article for electro (music) but this refers to a strand of funk music and since funk is mentioned in none of the reviews Electronic music is used instead.... "music which is produced with electronic music". The instrumentation in this song is electronic. I dont know why it is so difficult for people to accept that. if you refused to accept that Digital Spy's analysis of the song is correct in calling it Electronic then we would have to remove "R&B" as well because it is the only review which mentions that as a genre. You can't pick and choose which elements of a review you wish to apply to the song and ignore the others because you don't feel like they suit the artist. Songs are individual works of publication and thus their genre can vary from the album/artist in question. Would you call Flesh Tone R&B because Kelis is an R&B artist? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 17:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

You are moving further and further into strawman territory. As far as I can see, nobody on this talk page, including Kevon100 and I, dispute the notion that artists and songs can fit under multiple music genres. Nobody would be complaining if the inclusion of Ska, Electronica, Extreme Metal, Jazz, Classical, New Age or any other genre in the infobox was supported by reliable sources that clearly identifies the song as such. Not sources whose wording are vague enough for editors to dispute their interpretation of them. If a song does indeed fit under a certain genre, one would generally expect there to be multiple reliable sources clearly identifying it as such - especially when the song is a famous #1 hit. And no, that's not original research. That's just common sense. --175.140.9.20 (talk) 19:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, I am happy to settle for Electro-R&B as opposed to R&B, electronic because the latter is not a recognized term for a music genre, it is just used to describe just about any song with electronic properties. To be honest, I'm not disputing ska as part of the genre listing, that is something that would have to be settled between the unregistered user and the other editors. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 23:09, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Forgive my intrusion in this discussion -- I understand that Lil Unique is saying Rihanna has no control over what her sound is labeled as, but perhaps it might be prudent to just contact the artist directly? Kevon 100 -- I understand where you are coming from -- I'm a Trinidadian raised on reggae-related genres and I've NEVER heard any ska or anything ska-related that sounds like "What's My Name" before but shouldn't we offer some elasticity in interpretation? Clearly Rihanna herself has said "What's My Name" has an island feel for her. Seriously, I know this may be a lot to even ask but...has anyone just asked Rihanna what the heck she thinks? That might nip this situation in the bud!--mikomango (talk) 00:42, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

As the unregistered user said the genre can be listed as heavy metal, hard rock or even grunge but there has to be some form of source that meets the WP:Reliability and WP:Credibility terms. I am not disputing R&B or Ska in the listing, because ska-infused beats may imply ska as a subgenre since a song may fall into the categories of several genres. That is something the other editors will have to settle with the unregistered user. I've seen the listing however of Electronic as a genre. Not only on this article but on several others including Flesh Tone. That is an umbrella term and as far as I can see is NOT a music genre. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 17:56, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Where the review doesn't make clear if electronic refers to electropop, electronic dance music or electro (music) (sub-genre of funk) it is improper to link to anything other than electronic music. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | (talk) 18:00, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Can we do it as Electro R&B? It's a direct quote from the source as well. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 18:28, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

No... because electro is not an element of R&B... electro must be defined because it is separate thing to R&B hence the review says Electro-R&B not electro R&B. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | (talk) 18:32, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

So can't you place Electro-R&B?? Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 20:49, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

You can be Electro needs to be linked to something. It cannot be linked to R&B. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

You could put [[Electronic music|Electro]]-[[Contemporary R&B|R&B]] which would look like: Electro-R&B. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | (talk) 21:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

You could also add reggae to the genres:

• Vick, Megan (2010-11-19). "Rihanna feat. Drake, "What's My Name"". Billboard. Prometheus Global Media. Retrieved 2010-12-19.

—Yves (talk) 21:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

I think electro-R&B should suffice, the line from the Billboard article lacing a heavy reggae beat with synthesized organs'' is going to be disputed. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 21:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Would you be happy with [[Electronic music|Electro]]-[[Contemporary R&B|R&B]], [[ska]] which would look like: Electro-R&B, Ska? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | (talk) 23:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Sure, that is if our unregistered user has no issues. I think we've finally reached a consensus gentlemen. Kevon100 ^Talk! _{If you're ❺❺❺ then I'm ❻❻❻} 02:53, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

I still have issues with the inclusion of both Ska & Electro. Let alone reggae. Unfortunately, it appears the only way to get some attention here on wikipedia is to do some edit warring. Which I have no desire of doing. --175.138.167.241 (talk) 14:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

No we've listed to your arguments but in this case the evidence is clear. The Digital Spy review says "Electro-R&B", the AOL Radio review says "Ska-infused beats" and now we have the Billboard one saying "heavy Reggae beats". Thus this song is "Electro-R&B, Ska, Reggae" all as its primary genres because each genre describes a different aspect of the song. Ska and Reggae describe the beat/backing track while R&B describes the melody and "Electro" the instrumentation. A practical example where your argument might have been upheld is if I had used This Billboard review to claim "synthpop" based on a comment about synthesised organs. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Btw ... your POV is now contradictory.... you were arguing for R&B to be added and then when it was your arguing that other genres must be removed yet Electro is mentioned by the very same review mentioning R&B and thus by removing one the other would also have to be removed. Thus your disapproval of electro would mean that R&B would have to be removed as Digital Spy is the only source which mentions either genre. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:38, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps you are mistaking me for someone else but I have not been "arguing for R&B to be added". I have only been arguing against your sources for the inclusion of Ska & Electronica. I do not even have a problem with the inclusion of those genres if you can find some reliable sources that clearly, directly and unequivocally identify the song as such. Electro-R&B is not a genre. It does not have a page on wikipedia and if you were to create one, it will be deleted in short order. So its appearance here on the infobox is rather misleading. By the way, how do you even edit conflict your own self? --175.138.167.241 (talk) 17:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

You appear to have missed the point of my last comment. You argued strongly that the song was R&B even though initially there were no sources to support the claim. Now that a source has been found (Digital Spy), it also mentions Electro as a genre so either Electro-R&B is added or neither is mentioned. Also you need to drop the talk of electronica, I've agreed that was incorrect and instead I've added Electro (as in Electronic music) per the two mentions. As for unequivocally identifying genres ... Billboard clearly says with a "heavy reggae beat" while AOL says "with Ska-infused beats". Both sources thus state that the beat/backing track element of the song is reggae and ska. It could not be clearer. I even gave you the definition of 'infused' from a worldwide published dictionary to prove there is no synthesis going on yet you have not presented a coherent or logical argument for why this is incorrect. All you've done is repeatedly said is it is not this or it is not that. This is a clear cut case of reliable sources saying one thing and an editor arguing something else without evidence supported by citations. Any claim or 'fact' on wikipedia must be sourced and referenced. You cannot pick and choose what to include from the available sources. There is an edit conflict in what you said... hence I pointed it out. You're saying that the digital spy source is not clear enough to add "Electro" but its good enough to add "R&B". -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 21:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

What on earth is wrong with you? Please pay attention to what I am writing. I have already said that I am not the one who has been "arguing for R&B to be added". Stop confusing me with other editors, okay? Sheesh. --110.159.19.206 (talk) 09:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

(Just a suggestion for User--110.159.19.206--NAME yourself on Wikipedia so it's easier for you to participate in discussions without getting confused for others.) The fact that the beat is infused with reggae and/or ska is really obvious, it's something any listener who's ever heard a single piece of Caribbean music can detect. If the Gorillaz new album "The Fall" gets to be listed as "alternative hip hop" without an ounce of actual rapping in it, we've come a long way from denying elasticity to our genre definitions. Give this topic a rest already!!!--mikomango (talk) 15:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

The song is neither ska nor electronica. This is truly one of the lamest edit wars, ever. Viriditas (talk) 11:12, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

This is not an edit war. It is simply one (maybe two users) screaming as loud as they can to try and discredit reliable sources from industry critics which call the song Electro-R&B (not electronica), Ska and reggae. It is a display of a clear lack of understanding that the charts which a song appears on have very little to do with the genre of the actual song itself and more to do with the choices of the radio stations which add them to their playlists. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and thus information must be verifiable. As of present, there is a reliable and sourced claim to the songs genres and no evidence has been presented to suggest otherwise hence the matter is closed as far as I am concerned. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 17:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

There are no good sources that categorize this song as "ska" or "reggae", and after listening to the song in full, I have enough musical knowledge about ska and reggae to reasonably conclude that it fits neither category. This appears to be an example of editors misunderstanding how to use reliable sources and how to categorize a topic appropriately. I came here from the RfC to give my opinion, and I have nothing further to say. Viriditas (talk) 21:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

• Strong Oppose. If there are reliable sources that confirm that the song is a ska and reggae music, should be placed again. Vítor&R (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
  • There are no such reliable sources "confirming" it, because the song is clearly neither ska nor reggae. This is the silliest discussion I have ever seen. Viriditas (talk) 21:37, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

WP:POINT. If you do not like the discussion, then don't discuss the obvious. Vítor&R (talk) 20:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

For a silly discussion, you've spent an awfully long time making a fuss. You are obviously oblivious to AOL Radio (one of the biggest online radio stations) describing the song's beats as Ska. Also you're denying the existence of Billboard Magazine (the biggest US Music magazine and compiling authority of the US charts) which describe the heavy reggae beat and one of the UK's biggest Entertainment websites (Digital spy) which calls the song "Electro-R&B". Screaming and shouting one's opinion does not make it more valuable or more valid especially in the light of these highly reliable industry sources which pick out the song's key genres. I wish people would stop being silly and claiming that us editors who have a few years experience editing music articles, and experience with WP:GAs, have no idea what we're talking about. If the industry's biggest media outlets call the song ska or reggae then how is it abusing reliable sources to incorrectly claim something else? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

I have removed the categories listing this song as "ska" and "reggae". In addition to using good sources as a basis to write our articles, we also need to show good editorial judgment, and understanding of the sources that we use. Very often, we will even find good sources that are wrong, contain errors, and while otherwise useful in many respects, it is up to editors to use sources responsibly. This includes discarding typos, egregious errors of fact, and inconsistencies with other sources on the same topic. In this discussion we are dealing with what I see as the misinterpretation of a source(s). I think all reasonable editors will agree with the "Electro-R&B" category, as that appears to be accurate and appropriate based on the information that we have at our disposal. However, the fact that some editors have found one or two sources that say the song is "infused" with ska or reggae beats, does not make the song a member of Category:Ska songs or Category:Reggae songs. That much is clear. As an example, if I have a tea infused with strawberries and/or lemons, it does not get "categorized" as a member of Category:Fragaria or Category:Hybrid Citrus. In other words, an infusion of musical elements does not categorize the whole; rather it is by definition, a minor quality representing a part. Categories, on the other hand, are used to narrow or limit their members based on qualities as a whole. The whole in this instance, is Contemporary R&B, which according to Wikipedia, contains elements of hip hop, soul, R&B, pop and funk. Now, the sources used to argue that this song should be categorized as ska and reggae are the following:[1]][2] Please pay close attention to those sources, as neither provides any justification for adding those two categories. Editors need to be careful to stick closely to the sources and not to misinterpret them in a way that would introduce original research into our articles. If there is still a question as to whether this song should be categorized as "ska" or "reggae" (which it clearly is not), I would ask those who maintain this position to find better sources, as the two offered so far do not support the addition of these categories. Viriditas (talk) 00:49, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

I completely disgaree. The two sources provided which speak of Ska and Reggae are, if anything, more reliable than the source (one source) which calls the song Electro-R&B. The 'beat' is one element of a song's production and it is clearly described as being both Ska and Reggae. Hence the song is an Electro song, an R&B song, a Ska song and a Reggae song. Songs are often of multiple genres. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

This song is categorized as R&B. However, the fact that this song has island or Caribbean beats (per the sources) does not make it a member of ska or reggae songs. This is not a ska or reggae song, and there are no sources that make that claim. You are welcome to find sources that do. Viriditas (talk) 01:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Songs are composed of vocals, melodies and beats. Describing the beat as ska or reggae means that the song can be classified as reggae and ska. Is the beat not part of the song? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

To say that I am originally researching things by classifying the songs as such... is rather misplaced. I've done the exact opposite to yourself. Have you forgotten that not too long ago you were proudly boasting that "you have enough musical knowledge about ska and reggae to reasonably conclude that it fits neither category"? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Also you're using the wrong sources as examples. It is AOl Radio that says the song has a ska-infused beat while it is Billboard who refer to its heavy reggae beat. Digital Spy calls it Electro-R&B. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:32, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

"Ska infused beats" doesn't mean "ska" (and in this case, it means that there's a reviewer that doesn't know ska at all, based on the one-minute sample at iTunes), "heavy reggae beat" is also a bit ambiguous. What I don't hear in this song is a rapid tempo with strong major chords on the backbeat (making it ska) or a moderate tempo song with minor chords on the backbeat (making it reggae). Call it OR if you want, but this song isn't ska or reggae, and, given that the sources don't clearly identify it as either, I wouldn't include either genre. Feel free to correct me if the iTunes sample is somehow misleading. One good thing about this argument: it made me pull up Desmond Dekker on the music machine.—Kww(talk) 01:55, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

However I do hear the chin-ka beat that our article on Ska mentions. And the heavy reggae beat from Billboard to me clearly indicates elements of reggae. My issue is that simply classifying the song as R&B is not an accurate representation of the song considering that both in composition and style, the song is considerably different to Rihanna's earlier work on Good Girl Gone Bad which is a heavy R&B album.

These styles actually do have definitions and standards, and "ka-chink" vs "chin-ka" isn't a part of them. The placement of the bass and treble components of the beat, the stress on the off-beats, and whether the off-beats have major or minor chords all go into determining where a song fits in the calypso-mento-ska-rocksteady-reggae-dancehall-other continuum. This song doesn't meet any reasonable definition of any of those genres. Fortunately, the reviewers didn't specifically state that is was any of them, just that it had borrowed components from them. If they had, we would be pretty much obliged to follow their mistake. Since they didn't, we can describe the song as R&B and be done with it. Don't get me started on what passes for R&B these days, either. Go to http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/guns-of-navarone/id310322865?i=310322876 ("Guns of Navarone"), which is probably the prototypical ska song, and listen to it. Tell me what that has in common with this song. http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/54-46-was-my-number/id263973?i=263883 is a link to "54-46 Was My Number", which I would class as a pure piece of rocksteady. Peter Tosh's "African" is probably as pure a piece of reggae as you can find (http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/african-live/id190235933?i=190236598). Those three genres pretty much define the range that people could argue about. There just isn't any of that in this song.—Kww(talk) 02:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

In what world do "ska-infused beats" automatically make a song ska? Ska is an influence, but certainly not a primary genre, and there are no reliable sources to support it as a genre of a song. Why is this being dragged out? Using a source that calls an element (not the whole) of a song "ska-infused" to support the song as a whole being ska is WP:OR at its finest. Remove and add back if there is a reliable source that calls the entire song itself ska. Warrants a mention in the composition section. Not in the infobox or categories. –Chase (talk / contribs) 06:19, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok guys. I understand what you mean now... (with the help of Kww's examples). I will remove Ska and Reggae from the infobox and categories. Can we mark this thread as closed? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 16:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested for comment. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

spelling

PLEASE CHANGE IT FROM "HIGH-WASTED" TO "HIGH-WAISTED" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.111.193 (talk) 20:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

thanks!!!--mikomango (talk) 18:13, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Live Performances: AMA 2010

The songs order is wrong listed. The order of the songs Rihanna performed at the American Music Awards 2010 is: Love The Way You Lie (Part II) / What's My Name / Only Girl (In The World). OK, I've fixed it! Johnnyboytoy (talk) 12:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Add C.d Single For U.K.?!!

Hi People.. i dont really know how to use this but Ri Ri's Song's What's My Name was released to the uk as a 2 track c.d single.. i had an email saying it was available to by at 9am... (Monday 24Th January 2011) can u add it in?! here's a link to the UK Amazon if that help's?!! :) http://www.amazon.co.uk/WhatS-My-Name-2-Track-Rihanna/dp/B004FL9NVC/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1295909300&sr=1-2 << theres the link!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.106.100 (talk) 22:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality of article.

This article needs an overhaul. How it passed GAN I do not know. Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 02:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

It looks good to me. It just needs some fixes in the references. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:25, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

It needs a bit more than "some fixes" Jivesh. The references are a mess and lots of prose issues, as well as MoS. I would improve it myself but Tomica would most likely get annoyed with me for "giving tips". Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 13:36, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

I will take a closer look at this article tomorrow. But I can assure you that is is better than many other GAs in the Rihanna Wiki-project itself. Sorry for being honest but you know I am not lying. The prose here though not excellent, is still good. The major issue is only the references and they can easily be dealt with. Leave Tom a message. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:39, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't think so Jivesh. There are references which are blogs, some without publishers, wrong italics, the music video section is virtually non-existent, major overlinking and underlinking in the article, live performances is one clump, tables do not conform with WP:ACCESS, there are double quotation marks in the refs, double full stops, lots of inconsistencies with the formatting, different work and publishers are used for the same thing and double spaces. C'mon now, no other Rihanna GA is like this, don't be insulting. Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 13:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

I am not being insulting. Didn't I say since the beginning the references are problematic? Didn't I? The list you gave me here concerns references, except the nearly nonexistent music video section you mentioned, right? One clump is not a problem. WP:ACCESS is not an imposed rule but it is better to follow it anyway. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:51, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

No, they prose as a whole, is too chat like and colloquial. Plus, double digit numbers should be written numerically. Considering who the reviewer was, I'm surprised he let it pass in this condition. Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 13:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

The same thing you wrote here, apply it in the old articles you have promoted to GA. This is a friendly advice. The prose was very good when it was promoted. The article owes its current state to IPs. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't look any different, and the same mistakes are still there. Even "Italy" hasn't got the grey background, and it passed like that. Don't lie Jivesh, this article could be hugely improved. Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 13:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Lol. I am not lying Calvin but yes, with proper formatting of references and a c/e. Things will look better. Calvin, you should understand that GAs deteriorate with time. Look at this and this. I have taken a Beyonce article as an example so that you don't tell me I am talking only about Rihanna. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 14:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

GA's only deteriorate if you let them Jivesh. Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 14:08, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Okay. That's your point of view and I respect it. Full stop. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:25, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Great link for production information

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may11/articles/the-mix-review.htm - Feel free to use. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 16:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

it is a really good link

Lumka4candice (talk) 08:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Why not mention of the solo version?

We all know that Drake wasn't originally to be on the song. A cover was even released without the "featuring Drake" before the final version came out. Why no mention? — Status {^talk_contribs 19:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

This article isn't too comprehensive at the moment. I'm sure it will be added. Calvin • ^{Watch n' Learn} 00:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

I am busy in Real Life, I have exams until December 26 .. after that I will improve this and also other articles. — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 08:36, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

How did this become a GA?

Till 02:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Very simple. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 09:06, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Till, if you have a complain abot this article say it, do not make a question and left. If you believe this article does not meet the GA criteria, you can take it to GAR. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

The reviewer obviously couldn't be bothered with the many issues with the article and just passed it for the sake of passing it. Till 03:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Then give your ideas here or here instead of wasting Wikispace. Talk pages were created to discuss issues within the article, not to say "lol" and left incomplete questions. If the article has multiple issues, fix them by yourself or left your ideas in an appropiate place, and let somebody else can fix them. By now you are violating the talk pages policy. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Instead of telling me off, please go do something about that terrible attitude of yours. Till 08:05, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Can I interject? If someone sees a GA that they think has been incorrectly passed the best thing to do is put it up for reassessment. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Started the reassessment yesterday. Till 22:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

TBH that's the fairest way to do it. There was some concern over Rihanna and Beyonce articles previously but this wasn't one of the ones that initially came up when articles were reviewed. I agree there are some issues, whether these hamper the GA status i'm not too sure. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

• Comment— that reassessment page has been open for three weeks and no one has bothered to fix the issues or even comment on it. Till 06:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)