Talk:Wham Paymaster robbery

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 11, 2014, May 11, 2019, May 11, 2023, and May 11, 2024.

United States: Old West / Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West (assessed as Low-importance).
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Mid-importance).

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Change in Army Procedures.

Did the army change its procedures following the robbery ? If so, what were the changes ? 31.69.69.106 (talk) 08:52, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While researching the article I found no indications of the U.S. Army changing its procedures due to this robbery. The eleven man escort was stronger than normal procedures called for at the time (I am unable to relocate the supporting source, but a nine man escort was considered normal at the time). It was also standard procedure to keep the time and route used to transfer the payroll secret but the limitations of geography (there was only one road through the pass along the direct route between Ft. Grant and Ft. Thomas) and events such all the soldiers at Ft. Grant suddenly having money clearly allowed the robbers to make a fairly accurate guess as to when and where Major Wham would make the transfer. One change that did occur a year or two after the robbery was combining paymaster operations in the District of Arizona and Department of New Mexico. The change appears to have been a cost savings move as it allowed for all troops in the combined area to be payed with only five instead of six paymasters. --Allen3 ^talk 10:33, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Questioning May 11 as the date

this newspaper account says that on the 12th, they hadn't yet been robbed. Toddst1 (talk) 16:08, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That article is dated May 12, and it says, "It was at this point, three miles north of Cedar Springs, in a deep narrow gorge, that Major Wham was yesterday attacked." Thus, May 11 is correct. —howcheng {chat} 20:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraphs

... are perhaps the longest I've seen on Wiki. Should be broken up into smaller ones. - HappyWaldo (talk) 04:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. (But not my gnomish interest at present.) Re-assessing article as C class. – S. Rich (talk) 03:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Use of material in other Wikipedia articles

Material from this article was used in the article on Sgt. Benjamin Brown. Sean Barnett (talk) 01:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]