Talk:Westfield Galleria at Roseville
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Westfield Galleria at Roseville article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
comment
[edit]The infobox states that the opening was August 20 of 2000. My brother's birthdate is August 9th, and I remember that it was open that weekend in 2000. Perhaps August 20th was the grand opening date, but it was open before that? Killiondude (talk) 09:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Some things to clean up.
[edit]I think this article is in violation of WP:NOTDIR. See WP:ANC for more info specific about directories of stores in mall articles. Another thing that is slightly odd about this page, is that the inline citations are given in the section title. This is totally out of place. It is sort of an eye sore to see a huge inline citation next to a title. Lastly, I think the writing can be edited a little bit for better flow. Short, stubby sentences can be combined to make it easier to read. It provides good info, just needs some copy-editing down. Other than those few items, I'm liking the article. The references are nice. They could be updated a little bit (most were last accessed in 2006). It could potentially be a really good article. Once the problems I've listed have been solved, it can easily be a B-Class article. Killiondude (talk) 07:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Controversy section
[edit]I'd like some permission to delete the "Controversy" section about the priest being arrested for tresspassing because he was preaching the Gospel; the only source of such an event occurring is World News Daily, which has a reputation of being... shall we say, less than truthful. Even if there were other sources of such an event occurring, I'd still recommend the deletion of the section, as similar events happen in malls all over the country if not the world. --MicahBrwn (talk) 23:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- A different link The arrest directly led to the conversation rule. Lots42 (talk) 08:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- I was just talking to Rosiestep about this issue yesterday. I concur with Micahbrwn. Personally, I am HUGE on consensus. I've added the rewrite template to the section, because at best its poorly written. If, after a month hence the section has not been heavily edited, and/or there has not been significant discussion on the matter I'm going to delete it. AlaskaMike (talk) 11:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
COI tag
[edit]This article has been subject to paid editing - please see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#User:MallExpert. I have put a COI tag on it. The article needs to be reviewed for compliance with WP:NPOV and valid souring per the tag. Once the article is reviewed by independent editors, the tag can be removed - please make a note here if you remove the tag. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 22:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Westfield Content Change Request
[edit]Hello. My name is Erik Even, and I am a Web Producer for Westfield Corporation. We're concerned that many of the Wikipedia pages for Westfield centers have incorrect or outdated information, and even content that is not NPOV.
I have read the rules for Conflict of Interest, and I will not be attempting to make any page edits. I will simply be going into talk pages, and suggesting edits, which the community may then either act on or not. I genuinely appreciate any help you can give.
Our suggested text is below, which is meant to be the first paragraph.
Again, thank you for your help.
Suggested text:
Westfield Galleria at Roseville is a two-level, 1.3 million-square-foot indoor shopping mall in Roseville, California, United States. Owned by the Westfield Corporation, it is located at the corner of Galleria Boulevard and Roseville Parkway, at the junction of State Route 65 and Interstate 80. Its anchor stores include Macy’s, JCPenney, Nordstrom, and Sears. The center features the Sacramento-area locations of retailers Louis Vuitton, Burberry, Tiffany & Co., Kate Spade New York, and Hugo Boss.
ErikEvenWestfield (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Go for it. Killiondude (talk) 22:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Westfield Galleria at Roseville. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101023063506/http://www.sacbee.com:80/2010/10/21/3121945/roseville-galleria-suspect-in.html to http://www.sacbee.com/2010/10/21/3121945/roseville-galleria-suspect-in.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Westfield Galleria at Roseville. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141116170842/http://www.sptimes.com/2005/06/01/Business/If_you_didn_t_call_th.shtml to http://www.sptimes.com/2005/06/01/Business/If_you_didn_t_call_th.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160604162301/http://www.westfieldcorp.com/news_announcements/westfield-galleria-at-roseville-celebrates-grand-opening-of-us-270-million-expansion/ to http://www.westfieldcorp.com/news_announcements/westfield-galleria-at-roseville-celebrates-grand-opening-of-us-270-million-expansion/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
What happened to the store sizes?
[edit]The store sizes were here. What happened to them? I thought it was useful information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.245.5.89 (talk) 22:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC)