Talk:Westernization/Archives/2020
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Westernization. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Vandalism
This page is being vandalised for unclear reasons and should be returned to edit:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westernization&oldid=995852293
The last edit to address the issues of brevity, need for page sources, and accuracy of the term ie the main section. User Danloud apparently has strong political, but ahistorical stances that Russia should be a Western and European country. This stance exists, but is not neutral, not cause for reversion, and according to Wikipedia policy should not be cause for undoing scores of edits. Concerns should be brought up here rather than discussionless reversions. DxRxXxZx (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Brevity Required
I think that this page is a bloated mess which very few people will engage with apart from pedantic academics. Is there any consensus to edit it to be more accessible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.160.51.153 (talk) 06:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Proposal to organize countries influenced by the West under regional headings
The list for "countries influenced by the West" is horrendous to read.
First of all, it requires serious revision to grammar, style, relevant content. Secondly, it is hitherto everywhere in a long bulky list.
I propose the headlining of regions under collapsable headers, i.e. Westernization in the Eurasian region (Eastern Europe, North and Central Asia), Westernization in South Asia, Westernization in Southwest Asia, Westernization in East Asia, Westernization in Oceania, Westernization in Africa, Westernization in the New World. DxRxXxZx (talk) 21:36, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Please refrain from making further changes until editors have had time to review your suggestions. You may post your potential ideas here for all to critique and comment. In any case, a consensus will be needed to alter that much info. Archives908 (talk) 03:57, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Clearly, you have an agenda. Not only did you ignore what I wrote here, you also reinstated your edit and failed to bring it to the talk page (even though you claimed you did). That's a big no-no. Archives908 (talk) 14:31, 26 December 2020 (UTC)