Talk:Western Eagles FC

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal Western Eagles FC is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Not done no request and article is not protected

How can I get the Western Eagles FC article protected (semi-protected) ? Lukasz.Lewinski16 (talk) 21:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

You would have to apply at WP:Requests for page protection - but as there has been no obvious vandalism in the last year, let alone ongoing vandalism, this would almost certainly be refused - we do not protect articles pre-emptively - Arjayay (talk) 11:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]