Talk:Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Squatting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copied from WCAEC website?

It seems like a lot of this article is copied from the campaign's website at http://antieviction.org.za/about-us/ which poses two problems: the copyright violation, and the probable non-neutrality. I don't want to remove the text, because it will leave basically no article, but it would be good if someone familiar with the topic can rewrite the article to be not-a-copyright-violation and NPOV. - htonl (talk) 14:14, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The website is 'Copy Left' meaning copying the material for non-profit based distribution is encouraged. However, it should be edited and improved so as to use more sources than that website. That much is definitely necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaredsacks (talk • contribs) 11:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point out where on the website the copyright license is? I couldn't find it. Also, it can't just be generally copyleft; it has to be either released to the public domain, or under the GFDL. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Even if we are allowed to copy the text, I think generally as a matter of principle we shouldn't just use an organisation's own text to describe that organisation; it's not likely to meet WP:NPOV. - htonl (talk) 17:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Will find out about what copyright it is officially...though i know its not a strict one. And agreed that generally shouldnt copy. Want to edit it?Jaredsacks —Preceding undated comment was added at 09:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Update: Copyright is Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaredsacks (talk • contribs) 11:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues are addressed, but just reading the first couple paragraphs, it's obviously very biased. SHould be changed to neutral.

Reworking Article

I have begun the arduous task of fixing this article which was made mostly without citations. For the next few days, when editing, please do not remove information for lack of citations as I am in the process of these citations. If afterwards no citations are found, you or I can remove them.

If anyone wants help improving this article, that would be much appreciated. Frombelow (talk) 11:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to find citations, apart from the organisation's own website, for the claims under 'Co-ordinators' and 'Activities'. Could not find any either. What now? BlandBaroque (talk) 18:45, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Frombelow, the more I look at parts of this article, the more problems. The stuff from the Campaign's own website must obviously go. What do you think? BlandBaroque (talk) 15:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So I've taken out the stuff from the organisation's own website. IMO it reads much better now and is more convincing without the soapbox tone. Thee are still many citation and NPOV issues with this article though. If I have time< i'll try improve some more.BlandBaroque (talk) 04:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Academic References

Should a wikipedia article contain a list of academic references that are not cited in the article? My impression is that it should not. But if it should this needs to be fixed because:

1. These references are not all academic texts. 2. The academic best known for writing on the WCAEC (Legassick) is not listed here!

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Evictions

Are you allowed to get evicted if there is still state of disaster even if court granted it but you have no where to go because you lost everything during covid hit south Africa 164.160.118.10 (talk) 09:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]