Talk:West Worldham/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 16:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Another great job, Dr. Blofeld! --Thine Antique Pen (talk • contributions) 16:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reviews, I'm used to a lot more criticism though! They're not as good as nearby Bentworth but they're smaller villages and are pretty comprehensive on what exists on the web. West Worldham is a hamlet really.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]