Jump to content

Talk:West Hendford Cricket Ground/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Relentlessly (talk · contribs) 07:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This is nearly there, but there are a few things to clear up.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    A few bits of prose read oddly, mainly in the first paragraph of "History".
    "Yeovil and County Cricket Club were formed" – here I believe you need the singular, as you're referring to a single entity, not a collection of individuals. The same later in the same sentence.
    "the club was reformed with the lesser remit" – you mean "re-formed", I think
    You use "the club" several times starting after "The club played at West Hendford" but you are referring to two different clubs. This is quite confusing.
    Pet peeve: "from 17–19 August" really ought to be "from 17 to 19 August".
    Final paragraph of "History": "The final first-class match was played on the ground" should be "The final first-class match on the ground was played".
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Reference 26 is broken
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    You're understandably a little uncertain about the non-free use rationale, but I think it's valid.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for 7 days to address the above issues. Relentlessly (talk) 07:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the review Relentlessly. I've had a run through the article, and I think your comments have all been addressed. Harrias talk 11:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Modifications look good. Pass. Relentlessly (talk) 13:16, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]