Jump to content

Talk:Werner Mölders/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Criteria

[edit]
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  • The article is well written. I have fixed any issues I had with grammar and seems to be mostly compliant with the MOS.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • The article is well cited, there appears to be no original research.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • The article is broad in its coverage, without being too broad so as to lose focus.
  • The article maintains NPOV, and fairly represents the topic.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  • The article appears stable. Most of the recent edits have been undertaken by only a couple of editors.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':
  • Images seem to meet the guidelines. Should be no dramas.
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

I have reviewed this article, made any changes I felt necessary and now feel that it is a Good Article. As such I am passing it.

AustralianRupert (talk) 13:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]