Talk:Wenhu line

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wenhu line article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	May 13, 2020

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. The editor who added the request suggests the following:

add a geographic map

strange route

Why does the route look so inefficient between Zhongshan Junior High and Songshan Airport? – Kaihsu (talk) 22:30, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah: zh:松山機場站#.E8.B7.AF.E8.BB.8C.E7.89.B9.E8.89.B2 – Kaihsu (talk) 15:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 January 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

– TRTC had adjust rule to number lines. They have no longer used numbers to label metro lines. For example Line 1 is now Brown line.[1] John123521 (Talk-Contib.) RA 03:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose proposal, Support Wenhu Line, Tamsui-Xinyi Line, Songshan-Xindian Line, Zhonghe-Xinlu Line and Bannan Line. Timmyshin (talk) 04:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose somewhat per Timmyshin, in that the proposal is over-disambiguating, but use lower-case "line" per various previous RMs (i.e., per WP:NCCAPS, WP:MOSCAPS). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 13:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—indeed, please use lowercase "line". Tony (talk) 13:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose John123521's proposal, Support Wenhu Line, Tamsui–Xinyi Line, Songshan–Xindian Line, Zhonghe–Xinlu Line and Bannan Line. Consider MOS:NDASH. Sawol (talk) 13:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose but follow Sawol's suggestion instead. Consider downcasing Line as SMcCandlish says, though in these cases it looks to me like they are usually treated as proper names in sources, so cap Line is probably OK, too. Dicklyon (talk) 18:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. Taipei Metro's official website (in both EN & ZH) still shows number identifiers for all lines. Useddenim (talk) 13:49, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose all. No rationale in terms of common names of the lines, there even seems doubt that the official names have changed consistently. Andrewa (talk) 10:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose any move until the new names have reached common usage. feminist (talk) 11:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.