Talk:Wendy Wood (psychologist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 8 December 2013 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs).

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 27 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yn5234a.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 June 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– Further disambiguation not required. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 04:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but there's no real need to move to article to new title as the current ones seem stable and (presumably) easy to find. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 04:10, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakura Cartelet: Is this view rooted in any of the five WP:CRITERIA? 207.161.86.162 (talk) 06:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The same page says that the criteria are goals and not rules (my emphasis added). Which one of the criteria do you feel isn't being met and how much better would it be with the new name? Sakura Cartelet^Talk 14:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why this is being contested. The relevant guideline is WP:NCPDAB (naming conventions for people including a disambiguating tag/parenthesis), which says "If possible, limit the tag to a single, recognizable and highly applicable term."

Clearly, criterion 4, "Conciseness – The title is no longer than necessary to identify the article's subject and distinguish it from other subjects", applies, and arguably criteria 5 (consistency).

Also, since both subject's studied psychology not sociology, and there are two types of social psychology: social psychology, the only sub-field of psychology, and social psychology (sociology),a sub-field of sociology, the proposed titles are arguably less ambiguous as well as more concise, so criterion 3 (precision) also applies. Llew Mawr (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I guess in that case, I can't think of any other reasons to oppose the move any more so am withdrawing my objections. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 17:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Absolutely. Unnecessarily verbose. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.