Talk:Wellington School, Somerset

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Unsourced allegations

I have removed various allegations which were completely unsupported. If you have any source for these allegations then feel free to post them here for checking: otherwise don't bother. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 11:51, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-added the scandals I could find sources for. Since they are both notable and well-sourced, I'd consider any further attempts to remove them vandalism. --Dtcdthingy 17:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect members of staff at the school are attempting to hide the scandals section. It should be made available as parents have the right to know along with freedom of information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.28.166.38 (talk) 14:19, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be an ongoing and persistent campaign to remove the Scandals section - is there a way to protect this? These events very much happened, and corroborating information is in the public record. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.31.204 (talk) 20:59, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC) best[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wellington School, Somerset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091017060802/http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/homepage/TV-chef-Keith-Floyd-dies-heart-attack/article-1339257-detail/article.html to http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/homepage/TV-chef-Keith-Floyd-dies-heart-attack/article-1339257-detail/article.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]