Talk:Wellard/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 21:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Quick fail criteria assessment
[edit]Reviewing the article against the "quick-fail criteria".
- The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
- - the article is well sourced with a wide array of reference material.
- The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
- - no obvious NPOV tone to article.
- There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
- - no tags on page.
- The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
- - no edit warring over article.
- The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
- - scope of article clear.
Article meets standards set out in the "quick-fail criteria", with no obvious issues or problems evident. Full review will now follow. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 21:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Main review
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- Well written. Prose is concise and flows. Paragraphs well structured and developed. No fragments or stand-alone sentences.
- b (MoS):
- Conforms to manual of style.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
- Well referenced. No broken links. Citation templates correctly formated.
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- Citations are to third party publications. References reflect a range of sources.
- c (OR):
- No evidence of OR.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.
- b (focused):
- Remains focused. No digressions.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
-
- No issues concerning POV evident.
-
- It is stable:
- No edit wars etc.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Images are properly tagged and justified.
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images are accompanied by contextual captions.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
I was a little dubious this could be done, but have been proved wrong. The article is a well presented, informative piece on a very easily overlooked subject. Congratulations! ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 21:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your review, Junipers Liege, it's much appreciated! Frickative 23:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)