Talk:WeiweiCam

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 August 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Overcitation

This article has so many citations as to be almost unreadable... are 8-10 citations to reliable sources needed to prove the sentence "His decision to put himself under further surveillance has been cited as an ironic gesture and a symbolic way to increase transparency in the Chinese government"? Perhaps just 1 or 2 reliable sources per sentence would be better. Khazar2 (talk) 21:37, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; I believe the 6-8 citations now remaining in the article cover all of the article's claims. If anyone's interested in seeing the other references as a basis for future expansion, they can be found in the earliest drafts of the article's history. Khazar2 (talk) 22:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Official" Website Links to Wikipedia Page

weiweicam.com, the "official" website, links to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WeiweiCam.

Can someone please explain why this happens? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.177.165 (talk) 14:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ai Weiwei or his supporters must have changed it on their end; I've removed the link accordingly, now that there's no content there. Khazar2 (talk) 16:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Found two more references for the article, April 15, 2012 Daily News & Analysis and Globe and Mail May 29, 2012. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]