Talk:Wehrmacht forces for the Ardennes Offensive/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll have a full review up shortly. Terrakyte (talk) 13:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Preliminary review

I'll first start by checking the article against the quick-fail criteria:

1. The article completely lacks reliable sources. NA
2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way. NA
3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including {{cleanup}}, {{wikify}}, {{NPOV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{fact}}, {{clarifyme}}, or similar tags. NA
4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars. NA
5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint. NA

I believe the article passes the quick-fail criteria. I'll conduct the full review now. Terrakyte (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Full review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I think this article is very good. I can't think of anything to suggest to improve the article atm. If I do, I will let you know. Well done. Terrakyte (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)