Military history: European / German / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV?

In the Movie paragraph: "the background of its maker Jan Philipp Reemtsma, heir of the Reemtsma tobacco company which had held a reported 60% market share in Nazi Germany." What does the market share have to do with Reemtsma's work as a social scientist or the Wehrmachtsausstellung? It's just a cheap kick in the side. This should be deleted or removed to an article about Reemtsma. --89.49.39.149 (talk) 12:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or article here

just combine the two articles, so no info is lost. i have to say this has more info than the other article. -Koppapa (talk) 13:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of which a great deal is uncited and coatrack. This ought be a redirect to the english language name at any rate, a merge of any usable content from here would be best. The Last Angry Man (talk) 13:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the united and coatrack content, I see not a great deal left to be salvaged, thoughts? The Last Angry Man (talk) 13:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed a merger to the English named article as this is the English wiki. The Last Angry Man (talk) 14:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger is fine, of course, but for technical reasons the merger must be into this one, because it's the older article. That's no judgment either of the merits of the two articles' contents, nor of their titles. Just go ahead and import whatever you feel was handled better in your new version. The title can be treated separately afterwards; if necessary this article can be moved over the position of the new one, but this would have to be done through a proper move, by an admin, not by copying and pasting content over. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:48, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that the merge should be into the first article (this one); and yes, although not perfect, this article did contain far more information, including details of what happened to the photographic exhibition in the last ten years. Isolated sentences from google books are not quite enough. Mathsci (talk) 15:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lets see if I understand correctly, English name needs merging here, then a move request needs be done to use English title? Not a problem, I shall merge and fix this article then it can be moved to the English title. The Last Angry Man (talk) 16:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's no point in using the English title as Wehrmachtsausstellung is the term used in academic texts (e.g. Mary Nolan's article in "Memory and the impact of political transformation in public space") and covers the three periods of the collection (Hamburg, Berlin and finally the archives of the German Historical Museum in Berlin). The title you chose did not apply to the exhibition in Berlin 2000-2004 or the archive. This is really a quite minor point as the redirects and explanations in the article can cover that. The word "Annihilation" should probably be replaced by "Extermination" in the current article. Mathsci (talk) 17:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's also a long article about the exhibition by Chloe Paver with Wehrmachtsausstellung in the title in "German memory contests: the quest for identity in literature, film, and discourse since 1990", Camden House, 2006. Mathsci (talk) 17:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had not realized that, fair enough the other ought stay as a redirect. The Last Angry Man (talk) 18:23, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wehrmachtsausstellung. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.his-online.de//fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/veranstaltungen/Ausstellungen/Press_Releases_VK.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COMMONNAME and WP:USEENGLISH

Google Ngrams reports that in English sources, the English name is more common than German one, and it's not consistently capitalized.[1] Therefore, I'm moving it to "Wehrmacht exhibition". There's no doubt that this is the primary topic of "Wehrmacht exhibition", as it is frequently discussed without further clarification in RS. (t · c) buidhe 22:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]