Talk:Weela Weela Walya/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The lead does not summarize the article, it contains material not found in the artcile, and omits material that is in the article. Please read WP:LEAD.

The ballad has been referenced in various books such "various" here is a weasel word.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
What makes the barely literate website http://www.zeban.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=146:weile-weile-waile&catid=35:song&Itemid=63&lang=en a reliable source?

The refernce to Sebastian Barry. Annie Dunne Penguin. May 2003 needs a page number.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
This is wehre the artcile falls down. Four sentences, less than a hundred words acbnnot by any means be thought of as broad coverage of the subject
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
None used.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
This article needs considerable expansion to meet the GA criterion of broad coverage, so I will nto be listing it now. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]