Jump to content

Talk:Wedding Crashers/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Untitled

I'm concerned about the unencyclopedic description of the movie, particularly in the Plot section, which fails to SUCCINCTLY summarize the movie, instead recapping to unnecessary detail. Also, unprofessional vocabulary (including at least one use of the word "gonna") and bad grammar run rampant. This needs to be fixed. Mitchell 00:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Please mention the origin of the "official" Wedding Crashers rules. Where did these come from?

Although many rules, including the numbers, were mentioned in the movie, there were definitely not more than 100 of them mentioned (although the numbers given by the characters did exceed 100). I don't know where the interpolations to the rule list came from. --Maande10 05:46, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

The rules came from one of the extras on the DVD and there were infact more than 100.

Who answered.Please sign. That way we'll know who looks foolish when the dust settles. "Infact" the young woman is correct, the movie did not mention nearly 100. The DVD added some. It also added a quail hunting game. Ironically, it involves drinking. Also ironically, and less-well-known, it gives extra points if you TRY to shoot the other hunters. 67.81.50.181 23:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

A cheap question: Does anyone know the names of the actresses who played the girl who are conquered by the crashers? I am especially interested in the actress that played the Asian girl!.

This film is funny yes but why all the need for all the smut and sexual stuff why does every single film have to have this stuff why need it ??? it didnt add any thing to the storyline or take away why cant directors and script writers need to put Bad language and sexual smuttyness into a film ????? typical hollywood greed for the big $$$$ or in my case being from the UK the big ££££ ....I will never watch this film again ....

And your personal view on this matter has what exactly to do with the wikipedia entry? 151.151.21.99 21:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)CostnerM

Regarding the Trivia section, the Orioles game John and Jeremy are wacthing is in color. Therefore, not all the TV's are in black and white and I have edited as such.

Plot Summary

The Plot Summary hasn't been written...And I don't own a copy of the movie for quick reference to write it...

DVD 2-pack source

Someone stated that both Wedding Crashers and The 40-Year-Old Virgin are available in a low-price 2-pack. I feel this needs a source. Both titles were released by two completely different studios- Time Warner and Universal Studios. I have searched on Amazon.com, Best Buy.com, and Circuit City.com and I have not seen this 2-pack as stated.

does anyone know who plays the wedding singer in this movie and what song he sang when he started cussing.?

I think you're referring to the movie The Wedding Singer. If my assumption is correct, you're thinking of "Total Eclipse of the Heart" by The Dan Band. -Rhrad 04:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
No, it's Old School where The Dan Band performs "Total Eclipse..." ChesterG 05:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Rules

Is the list of rules really necessary? It seems NN to me. Carl.bunderson 04:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Well as no one objects, I'm going through with it. Carl.bunderson 21:37, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Hmph. "see talk". See you talk to yourself? Riight. Well, they are notible. They're cited several times and serve as a key element in the character's lives. A bible, of sorts. Amd frankly, I'm getting really tired of these kind of notibility questions when have freaking list articles with a NN theme. Needless to say, I'm reverting your edit. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 15:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Agreed. I think have the rules here make this article a fun, useful, accurate reference. -Rhrad 04:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Agreed.

Anon user here, getting rid of the rules for the following reason: They are certainly not "notible" as about 80% of the rules quoted do not appear in the film at all. They are not illustrative of the characters and some seem to be unrelated to the movie. Furthermore, near the end of the movie Vince Vaughn belittles the rules and his stuttering when mentioning rule 115 suggests that there is no set of rules; they are all made up on the spot. Thus, there would be no stable list. I have a Wedding Crashers DVD, and there is no such list on my copy. I'm taking it out, if you want to revert it give me a valid reason.

Also, for the record: NOTABLE. NOTABILITY.

I see. What copy do you have? Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 01:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm the anon who got rid of the rules, now no longer anon. Apparently not signing in is some major sign of disrespect, that's fine I'll sign in. Uh, I have New line platinum series Widescreen Uncorked edition I can't find what year it came out, probably 2005. Despite the fact that I am new and made this comment anonymously, I stand by it. Jfocht1 09:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, I don't exactly agree with this, but I suppose it'd be me managable without the rules, and no one seems to be objecting. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 18:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry, but if you buy the poster from "http://www.beyondthewall.com", there is a poster, made by the people who produced this movie, The 115 [legitament] Rules of Wedding Crashing. So stop trying to ruin the fun of the rules and keep them on. Also on the official Wedding Crashers website, it has a link to "http://www.iamchazz.com", where it lists 50 of them.
The rules are on the DVD. End of discussion as far as I'm concerned. Mcflytrap 15:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)