Talk:Weaving a Story/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 18:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Lead and plot seem fine
- Production
- To whom was the project published?
- Maybe mentioning Weaving a Story's title could be fitting for the first paragraph.
- Reception
- Everything seems fine but was this the lowest rating so far or there was another one?
- The lowest of the lowest!
That's all.Tintor2 (talk) 18:40, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: Okay, then. Done!--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Will be reviewing this article.Tintor2 (talk) 18:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail: