Talk:Weather Star XL
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 June 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
New table format/layout
[edit]Dear viewers of the Wikipedia XL page, I have recently reformatted the layout of the table for headends currently known to carry the XL. Observation site, Channel Number, STAR ID, and additional notes all have their own columns. Leave your thoughts on this here, and I hope everyone likes it!
Aaron Wxfan127 (talk) 22:53, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
53 references.
[edit]53 references! This is just as bad as the Weather Star 4000 page I am working on. I guess I will try to clean this one up next. If anyone would like to help,jump in and help me.--BeckiGreen (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- A majority of those references are from the list of known XLs, so that may clean some of it up. --ZLMedia 10:14, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- I trimmed out the self-published YouTube vids, along with a lot of unverifiable information, and 11 references remain, all to archives of weather.com technical documents. (Nothing against lots of references, but the ones listed were not reliable sources). Agyle (talk) 04:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Notability, deletion, merge
[edit]The article currently cites no independent sources, which are required to show the subject is notable and eligible for a standalone article on Wikipedia. There is a proposal to merge the article information into WeatherStar, which I think is the best option if no independent sources are found. Agyle (talk) 04:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)