A fact from We answer to a higher authority appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 July 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
"...which portrays the products as being of a higher quality than other, similar products." is in the article.
Really? I always thought the "higher authority" in the slogan was a reference to God, not a reference to those hotdogs being "higher quality" than others. Stonemason89 (talk) 00:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The double meaning you describe was apparently clear to most people, creating a whimsical effect that contributed to the campaign's success. It's one of those creative ad-type things that can't be taken literally. You'll notice a lot of this going on—unless you don't, of course. I'm often oblivious to it myself, but It's usually because I haven't had enough coffee. – AndyFielding (talk) 22:14, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In 2010, the New York Times wrote that Hebrew National's hot dogs "aren't kosher enough for most Jews who keep kosher.
As far as I know, either something's kosher or it's not—and that in the US, for something to be considered kosher, it must be approved by and bear the official seal of some established organization, right? So how could something be considered "not kosher enough"? To use a popular simile, wouldn't that be like being "a little pregnant"? And wouldn't such a statement disparage the approving organization as much as anything else? One can only wonder, especially if one has nothing more useful to do, such as now. Just saying, already. – AndyFielding (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]