Talk:We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. BTW, I just reviewed your nomination for The Lighthouse. 👨x🐱 (talk) 02:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Add a non-free use rationale for the poster.
- The fair use rationale is already there. It's a section instead of a template. You might've missed it. Would you like me to convert it to a template anyway to avoid confusion? 👨x🐱 (talk) 00:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HumanxAnthro: Yeah, that's what I meant (it's better to have a template than writing it out). Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done 👨x🐱 (talk) 01:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason the "Starring by" parameter, the cast in the lead, and #Voice_cast are listed in different ways?
- (1) Because there's no "starring" bill in the poster (which was also true for another Amblimation film, Fievel Goes West, so the best option was to use how the cast was listed in the beginning)
- (2) The cast list section is for how the actors are ordered in the end credits.
- (3) I've ordered the voices in the lead per the end credits order. 👨x🐱 (talk) 00:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An unspoken rule is that the poster serves as a source for the infobox. However, Amblin Entertainment and the editors are not included in the poster or in the body of the article. Per MOS:INFOBOX, add sources, mention them in the body, or remove them from the infobox. Additionally, the running time also needs a source.
- All done. It's really Amblimation that worked on the film, which is already in the lead and body, so removed Universal and Amblin Entertainment. I've added a citation for the editors. You know, people who are credited in the fields of Template:Infobox film don't necessarily need their credits sourced because there's, you know, the end credits of the film itself crediting them, right? It's the same reason plot sections don't need citations. The film itself is the citation. Also used NY Times review as source for runtime. 👨x🐱 (talk) 00:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The given citation doesn't mention Sim Evan-Jones as an editor. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed named. She was actually a supervising editor according to AFI 👨x🐱 (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In this section and in others, is the title We're Back! A Dinosaur Story or We're Back: A Dinosaur Story? Try to be consistent.
- Good catch. I always thought it was "A Dinosaur Story". I never noticed the "'s" Anyway, fixing this. 👨x🐱 (talk) 00:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you made the good catch. I was referring to the uses of an "!" and ":" in between the title. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Used formatting of poster which used the exclamation point. 👨x🐱 (talk) 11:59, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot and cast

The plot section passes WP:FILMPLOT.
"accidently" → "accidentally"

Done Chompy Ace 23:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "citizens panic".

Done Chompy Ace 23:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add a serial comma after "Louie, Cecilia".

Done Chompy Ace 23:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cast section looks good.

Production

This section looks good.
Image is free to use so that's good.

Release and promotion

"Dinosaur renaissance" → "dinosaur renaissance" (per article linked)

Done Chompy Ace 23:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Second use of the term also needs to be changed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Chompy Ace 01:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"in a American suburb" → "in an American suburb"

Done Chompy Ace 23:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Storyto American theaters" → "Story to American theaters"

Done Chompy Ace 23:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

"gross $135 million" → "gross of $135 million"

Done Chompy Ace 23:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"highest grossing" → "highest-grossing"

Done Chompy Ace 23:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"film another indicator" → "film an indicator" (first mentioned reason)

Done Chompy Ace 23:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

#Critical_response looks great!
"best animated" → "best-animated"

Done Chompy Ace 23:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"ninth worst" → "ninth-worst"

Done Chompy Ace 23:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Archive sources.
- Bad news. Although I was able to add archive links to some cites, many of them are un-archivable. When I try to create new screens on archive.org, it kept saving the page, giving me a link only to say there's no screenshot! Also, if I tried saving a courant.com cite, the save screenshot redirects to the main page instead of the article itself. Sorry about that. 👨x🐱 (talk) 01:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mark all references from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".

Done Chompy Ace 23:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also believe some references are missing "|access-dates=" (see WP:CITEWEB and Template:Cite web#URL).
- Only one cite, a NY Times source, was missing an accessdate. I've added it 👨x🐱 (talk) 00:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's another one (which should have Washington Post changed to The Washington Post) also missing the parameter. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done 👨x🐱 (talk) 01:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Absolute thanks to User:Chompy Ace for his contributions! 👨x🐱 (talk) 12:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]