Talk:Wayne Lyman Morse United States Courthouse/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

This is a good piece of work. I've done some additional work on it myself, and I now believe it meets the GA criteria.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I made a few fixups in these areas.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I did some cite formatting work.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The major problem here was that the "Design" section including a lot of initial design and construction material that was a repeat of, or better belonged, in the "History" section. I've gone ahead merged/moved that material up.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I am passing the article. Note however that while it was nominated under "Law", I am going to file it as a GA article under "Art and architecture", because it's really more about that. Wasted Time R (talk) 17:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)