Talk:Wayne Allison (Canadian football)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bcschneider53 (talk · contribs) 00:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll Have Another. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 00:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Professional career

"While Allison wasn't named an all-star for the 1976 season," was not
Ref 15's url redirects to a different one; it can be replaced.

Simple enough. I normally don't like passing right away but I'm inclined to do so here since there was not much that needed to be done. I went ahead and fixed the two issues I raised above myself. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]