Jump to content

Talk:Waycross Air Line Railroad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rlink2 (talk22:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To T:DYK/P5

  • ... that the route of the former Waycross Air Line Railroad is now an important CSX Transportation line? Source: Storey, Steve; Ray, David; McDaniel, Matt (November 2018). Historic Railroads of Georgia: A Historic Context Study and Evaluation of Georgia's Historic Railroads Appendix A: Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad (PDF) (Report). pp. 3–12.
"The former ABC, including the original route of its progenitor, the Waycross Air Line, has become the longest and thus principal piece of CSX’s main through-route from Jacksonville, Florida to Atlanta and points beyond, and thus from the south Atlantic coast to the nation’s interior. As such, numerous sections of the ABC trunk line now feature double-tracked segments, and much of its length now utilizes concrete rail ties, to better withstand the heavy traffic volume."

5x expanded by Trainsandotherthings (talk). Self-nominated at 01:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Waycross Air Line Railroad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FormalDude (talk · contribs) 02:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll post comments here as I complete the review, which may take up to seven days. Thanks! ––FormalDude talk 02:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Review

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·